Donald Trump understood the power of narrative: Clinton was the villain of his story, he was the hero; the hero of the story was going to restore order to th...
OVERVIEW: Driving innovation—particularly disruptive innovation—demands that companies possess a deep understanding
of the nonobvious problems that will need to be solved in the future. Gaining this understanding requires that companies scan
their external environment, identify trends, and then envision future problem states from the perspective of end users or customers.
Such an outside-in view is difficult for successful incumbent firms that already possess a dominant logic about their
markets and competitive drivers. Strategic roadmapping provides the means to help companies develop this outside-in view
and challenge their current competitive perspectives. Here we present a 10-step methodology for strategic roadmapping and
show how one group at Intel was able to use this process to envision the future of its business in new ways.
Sense is a drag-and-drop programming environment that will allow you to develop rich multimedia programs within minutes. It has been designed to work with the SenseBoard, a powerful, flexible and yet amazingly simple-to-use hardware kit that can sit at the heart of a thousand different projects, giving you a few of the features of a research laboratory in something that fits in the palm of your hand. The possibilities are almost endless!
Magnetic Levitation Gives Computer Users Sense Of Touch ScienceDaily (Mar. 5, 2008) — Computers, long used as tools to design and manipulate three-dimensional objects, may soon provide people with a way to sense the texture of those objects or feel how
G. Katz, and E. Giesbrecht. Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiword Expressions: Identifying and Exploiting Underlying Properties, page 12--19. (2006)
S. Liu, C. Yu, and W. Meng. Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, page 525--532. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2005)
J. Reisinger, and R. Mooney. Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, page 109--117. Association for Computational Linguistics, (2010)
L. Ratinov, D. Roth, D. Downey, and M. Anderson. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Volume 1, page 1375--1384. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2011)
M. Turner. (2002)cite arxiv:astro-ph/0202008Comment: 17 pages Latex (sprocl.sty). To appear in the Proceedings of 2001: A Spacetime Odyssey (U. Michigan, May 2001, World Scientific).
I. Klapaftis, and S. Manandhar. Proceeding of the 2008 conference on ECAI 2008: 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, page 298--302. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, The Netherlands, IOS Press, (2008)
I. Klapaftis, and S. Manandhar. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations, page 414--417. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2007)
R. Koeling, D. McCarthy, and J. Carroll. Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, page 419--426. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2005)
D. Martinez, and E. Agirre. Proceedings of the 2000 Joint SIGDAT conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing and very large corpora: held in conjunction with the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Volume 13, page 207--215. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2000)
E. Voorhees. Proceedings of the 16th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, page 171--180. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (1993)
H. Schütze, and J. Pedersen. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, page 161--175. Las Vegas, USA, (1995)
G. Miller, C. Leacock, R. Tengi, and R. Bunker. Proceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology, page 303--308. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (1993)
W. Elshamy, D. Caragea, and W. Hsu. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, page 367--370. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2010)
D. Jurgens, and K. Stevens. Proceedings of the First workshop on Unsupervised Learning in NLP, page 113--123. Edinburgh, Scotland, Association for Computational Linguistics, (July 2011)
P. Andrews, J. Pane, and I. Zaihrayeu. Workshop on Discovering Meaning On the Go in Large Heterogeneous Data 2011, International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (2011)
J. Lin, C. Yang, S. Tseng, and C. Huang. Language, Information, and Computation - Proceedings of the 16th Pacific Asia Conference, page 320--329. (February 2002)
D. Yarowsky. HLT '93: Proceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology, page 266--271. Morristown, NJ, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (1993)
J. Schiefer, S. Rozsnyai, C. Rauscher, and G. Saurer. DEBS '07: Proceedings of the 2007 inaugural international conference on Distributed event-based systems, page 198--205. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2007)
T. Nguyen, J. Schiefer, and A. Tjoa. DOLAP '05: Proceedings of the 8th ACM international workshop on Data warehousing and OLAP, page 77--86. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2005)
J. McCarthy. Proceedings of the Teddington Conference on the Mechanization of Thought Processes, page 75--91. London, Her Majesty's Stationary Office, (1959)