In an earlier post I mentioned that one goal of the new introductory curriculum at Carnegie Mellon is to teach parallelism as the general case of computing, rather than an esoteric, specialized subject for advanced students. Many people are incredulous when I tell them this, because it immediately conjures in their mind the myriad complexities…
I recently diagnosed the root cause of a concurrency bug, CR6822370,
and thought it sufficiently interesting to share the details. (CR 6822370 actually represents a
cluster of bugs that are now thought to be related by a common underlying issue).
Briefly, we have a lost wakeup bug in the native C++ Parker::park() platform-specific
infrastructure code that implements java.util.concurrent.LockSupport.park().
The lost wakeup arises from a race that itself arises because of architectural
reordering that in turn occurs because of missing memory barrier instructions.
The lost wakeup may manifest as various 'hangs' or instances of progress failure.
Think writing a compiler is difficult? It is—unless you use Parrot, a complete compiler construction kit. With Parrot, crafting a new programming language is as easy as authoring a new website.
Program performance is always a concern, even in this era of high-performance hardware. This article, the first in a two-part series, guides you around the many pitfalls associated with benchmarking Java code. Part 2 covers the statistics of benchmarking and offers a framework for performing Java benchmarking. Because almost all new languages are virtual machine-based, the general principles the article describes have broad significance for the programming community at large.
P. Quitslund, E. Murphy-Hill, and A. Black. eclipse '04: Proceedings of the 2004 OOPSLA workshop on eclipse technology
eXchange, page 37--41. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2004)
P. Quitslund. CSE-04-005. Department of Computer Science and Engineering
OGI School of Science & Engineering
Oregon Health & Science University, 20000 NW Walker Road
Beaverton, OR 97006-8921 USA, (September 2004)
E. Murphy-Hill, P. Quitslund, and A. Black. OOPSLA '05: Companion to the 20th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on
Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, page 282--291. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2005)
C. Kapser, and M. Godfrey. WCRE '06: Proceedings of the 13th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering
(WCRE 2006), page 19--28. Washington, DC, USA, David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, IEEE Computer Society, (October 2006)
M. Conte, A. Trick, J. Gyllenhaal, and W. mei W. Hwu. WWC '98: Proceedings of the Workload Characterization: Methodology
and Case Studies, page 27. Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society, (1998)
A. Black, and N. Scharli. ICSE '04: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software
Engineering, page 676--686. Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society, (2004)