C. de Vries, C. Yu, G. Sakko, K. Wirth, K. Walters, C. Marion, und G. Martin. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110 (2):
145-154(März 2005)MT: Print; FO: Print; PO: Human; Male; Female; AG: Adulthood (18-yrs-and-older); Thirties (30-39-yrs); Middle-Age (40-64-yrs); MD: Empirical-Study; Quantitative-Study; TM: Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test; CRN: Number of References: 16; Displayed: 16.; REF: Cohen-Almeida, D., Graff, R. B., & Ahearn, W. H. (2000). A comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 329-334. Conyers, C., Doole, A., Vause, T., Harapiak, S., Yu, C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2002). Predicting the relative efficiency of the three presentation methods for assessing performances of persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 49-58. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-533. Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. S., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comprehension of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498. Higbee, T. S., Carr, J. E., & Harrison, C. D. (1999). The effects of pictorial versus tangible stimuli in stimulus-preference assessments. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 63-72. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(98)00032-8 Higbee, T. S., Carr, J. E., & Harrison, C. D. (2000). Further evaluation of the multiple-stimulus preference assessment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 61-73. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(99)00030-X Hughes, C., Pitkin, S. E., & Lorden, S. W. (1998). Assessing preferences and choices of persons with severe and profound mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 299-316. Logan, K. R., & Gast, D. L. (2001). Conducting preference assessments and reinforcer testing for individuals with profound multiple disabilities: Issues and procedures. Exceptionality, 9, 123-134. Lohrmann-O'Rourke, S., & Browder, D. M. (1998). Empirically based methods to assess the preferences of individuals with severe disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 103, 146-161. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(1998)1032.0.CO;2 Marion, C., Vause, T., Harapiak, S., Martin, G. L., Yu, C. T., Sakko, G., & Walters, K. (2003). The hierarchical relationship between several visual and auditory discriminations and three verbal operants among individuals with developmental disabilities. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 91-105. Martin, G. L., & Pear, P. (2003). Behaviour modification: What it is and how to do it (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Martin, G. L., & Yu, C. T. (2000). Overview of research on the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test Special Issue. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 7(2), 10-36. Northup, J., George, T., Jones, K., Broussard, C., & Vollmer, T. R. (1996). A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: The utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 201-212. Richards, D. F., Williams, W. L., & Follette, W. C. (2002). Two new empirically derived reasons to use the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107, 329-339. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(2002)1072.0.CO;2 Schwartzman, L., Yu, C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2003). Choice responding as a function of choice presentation method and level of preference in persons with developmental disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Community, and Rehabilitation, 1(3), Article 3. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.ijdcr.ca/VOL01_03_CAN/articles/schwartzman.shtml Windsor, J., Piche, L. M., & Locke, P. A. (1994). Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 439-455..
T. Vause, G. Martin, und D. Yu. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 7 (2):
123-141(Dezember 2000)SI: Special Issue: Recent research on the Assesment of Basic Learning Abilities Test.; MT: Electronic; Print; FO: Print; PO: Human; AG: Adulthood (18-yrs-and-older); Young-Adulthood (18-29-yrs); Thirties (30-39-yrs); Middle-Age (40-64-yrs); LO: Canada; MD: Empirical-Study; CRN: Number of References: 21; Displayed: 21.; REF: Barker-Collo, S. (1995). Live-to-live auditory matching: An extension of the assessment of basic learning abilities test. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 23, 72-81. Barker-Collo, S. (1996). Development and evaluation of the Communication Ability Screening Survey. International Journal of Practical Approaches to Disability, 20 (3), 23-31. Barker-Collo, S., Jamieson, J., & Boo, S. (1995). Assessment of basic learning abilities test: Prediction of communication ability in persons with developmental disabilities. International Journal of Practical Approaches to Disability, 19 (2), 23-28. Casey, L., & Kerr, N. (1977). Auditory-visual discrimination and language prediction. Rehabilitation Psychology, 24, 137-155. Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology (3rd Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: A Simon & Schuster Company. Harapiak, S., Martin, G. L., & Yu, D. (1999). Hierarchical ordering of auditory discriminations and the assessment of basic learning abilities test. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 6, 32-50. Kerr, N., Meyerson, L., & Flora, J. (1977). The measurement of motor, visual, and auditory discrimination skills. Rehabilitation Psychology, 24, 127-131. Krus, D. J., Bart, W. M., & Airasian, P. W. (1975). Ordering theory and methods. Los Angeles: Theta Press. Lin, Y. H., Martin, G. L., & Collo, S. (1995). Prediction of auditory matching performance of developmentally handicapped individuals. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 23, 1-5. Martin, G. L., & Yu, D. (2000). Overview of research on the assessment of basic learning abilities test. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 7, 10-36. Martin, G. L., Yu, D., Quinn, G., & Patterson, S. (1983). Measurement and training of AVC discrimination skills: Independent confirmation and extension. Rehabilitation Psychology, 28, 231-237. doi:10.1037//0090-5550.28.4.231 Meyerson, L. (1977). AVC behavior and attempts to modify it Monograph. Rehabilitation Psychology, 24, 119-122. Sparrow, S., Balla, D., & Cicchetti, D. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service. Stubbings, V., & Martin, G. L. (1995). The ABLA test for predicting performance of developmentally disabled persons on prevocational tasks. International Journal of Practical Approaches to Disability, 19, 12-17. Stubbings, V., & Martin, G. L. (1998). Matching training tasks to the abilities of people with developmental disability: ABLA test vs. experienced staff. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 102 (5), 3-13. Wacker, D. P., Kerr, N. J., & Carroll, J. L. (1983). Discrimination skill as a predictor of prevocational performance of institutionalized mentally retarded clients. Rehabilitation Psychology, 28, 45-59. doi:10.1037//0090-5550.28.1.45 Wacker, D. P., Steil, D. A., & Greenbaum, F. T. (1983). Assessment of discrimination skills of multiple handicapped preschoolers and prediction of classroom task performance. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8, 51-58. Walker, J. C., Lin, Y. H., & Martin, G. L. (1994). Auditory matching skills and the assessment of basic learning abilities test: Where do they fit? Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 22, 1-15. Ward, R. (1994). Bridging the gap between visual and auditory discrimination learning in children with severe developmental disabilities. Unpublished doctoral disseration, University of Toronto, Toronto. Ward, R., & Yu, D. (2000). Bridging the gap between visual and auditory discrimination learning in children with autism and severe developmental disabilities. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 7, 142-155. Witt, J. C., & Wacker, D. P. (1981). Teaching children to respond to auditory directives: An evaluation of two procedures. Behaviour Research of Severe Developmental Disabilities, 2, 175-189..