%0 Generic %1 sembolini2015nifty %A Sembolini, Federico %A Yepes, Gustavo %A Pearce, Frazer R. %A Knebe, Alexander %A Kay, Scott T. %A Power, Chris %A Cui, Weiguang %A Beck, Alexander M. %A Borgani, Stefano %A Vecchia, Claudio Dalla %A Davé, Romeel %A Elahi, Pascal Jahan %A February, Sean %A Huang, Shuiyao %A Hobbs, Alex %A Katz, Neal %A Lau, Erwin %A McCarthy, Ian G. %A Murante, Giuseppe %A Nagai, Daisuke %A Nelson, Kaylea %A Newton, Richard D. A. %A Puchwein, Ewald %A Read, Justin I. %A Saro, Alexandro %A Schaye, Joop %A Thacker, Robert J. %D 2015 %K cluster comparison galaxy simulations %T nIFTy galaxy cluster simulations I: dark matter & non-radiative models %U http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.06065 %X We have simulated the formation of a galaxy cluster in a $Łambda$CDM universe using twelve different codes modeling only gravity and non-radiative hydrodynamics (\art, \arepo, \hydra\ and 9 incarnations of GADGET). This range of codes includes particle based, moving and fixed mesh codes as well as both Eulerian and Lagrangian fluid schemes. The various GADGET implementations span traditional and advanced smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) schemes. The goal of this comparison is to assess the reliability of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of clusters in the simplest astrophysically relevant case, that in which the gas is assumed to be non-radiative. We compare images of the cluster at $z=0$, global properties such as mass, and radial profiles of various dynamical and thermodynamical quantities. The underlying gravitational framework can be aligned very accurately for all the codes allowing a detailed investigation of the differences that develop due to the various gas physics implementations employed. As expected, the mesh-based codes ART and AREPO form extended entropy cores in the gas with rising central gas temperatures. Those codes employing traditional SPH schemes show falling entropy profiles all the way into the very centre with correspondingly rising density profiles and central temperature inversions. We show that methods with modern SPH schemes that allow entropy mixing span the range between these two extremes and the latest SPH variants produce gas entropy profiles that are essentially indistinguishable from those obtained with grid based methods.

@misc{sembolini2015nifty, abstract = {We have simulated the formation of a galaxy cluster in a $\Lambda$CDM universe using twelve different codes modeling only gravity and non-radiative hydrodynamics (\art, \arepo, \hydra\ and 9 incarnations of GADGET). This range of codes includes particle based, moving and fixed mesh codes as well as both Eulerian and Lagrangian fluid schemes. The various GADGET implementations span traditional and advanced smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) schemes. The goal of this comparison is to assess the reliability of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of clusters in the simplest astrophysically relevant case, that in which the gas is assumed to be non-radiative. We compare images of the cluster at $z=0$, global properties such as mass, and radial profiles of various dynamical and thermodynamical quantities. The underlying gravitational framework can be aligned very accurately for all the codes allowing a detailed investigation of the differences that develop due to the various gas physics implementations employed. As expected, the mesh-based codes ART and AREPO form extended entropy cores in the gas with rising central gas temperatures. Those codes employing traditional SPH schemes show falling entropy profiles all the way into the very centre with correspondingly rising density profiles and central temperature inversions. We show that methods with modern SPH schemes that allow entropy mixing span the range between these two extremes and the latest SPH variants produce gas entropy profiles that are essentially indistinguishable from those obtained with grid based methods.}, added-at = {2015-03-23T09:34:50.000+0100}, author = {Sembolini, Federico and Yepes, Gustavo and Pearce, Frazer R. and Knebe, Alexander and Kay, Scott T. and Power, Chris and Cui, Weiguang and Beck, Alexander M. and Borgani, Stefano and Vecchia, Claudio Dalla and Davé, Romeel and Elahi, Pascal Jahan and February, Sean and Huang, Shuiyao and Hobbs, Alex and Katz, Neal and Lau, Erwin and McCarthy, Ian G. and Murante, Giuseppe and Nagai, Daisuke and Nelson, Kaylea and Newton, Richard D. A. and Puchwein, Ewald and Read, Justin I. and Saro, Alexandro and Schaye, Joop and Thacker, Robert J.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b7e1d8d2bdfd77e6d59d87edf7660ebf/miki}, description = {[1503.06065] nIFTy galaxy cluster simulations I: dark matter & non-radiative models}, interhash = {0598295ad68682b6631f11b88baf78fa}, intrahash = {b7e1d8d2bdfd77e6d59d87edf7660ebf}, keywords = {cluster comparison galaxy simulations}, note = {cite arxiv:1503.06065Comment: 21 pages, 13 figures, 4 tables - submitted to MNRAS}, timestamp = {2015-03-23T09:34:50.000+0100}, title = {nIFTy galaxy cluster simulations I: dark matter & non-radiative models}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.06065}, year = 2015 }