Abstract
We examine the hypothesis that business groups facilitate mutual insurance
among affiliated firms and find substantial evidence of risk sharing
by Japanese, Korean, and Thai groups but little evidence of it elsewhere.
We also find no correlation between measures of capital market development
and the nature of the legal system, on the one hand, and the extent
of risk sharing provided by business groups, on the other. The popular
view that risk sharing in business groups is important is not validated
by our analysis; other reasons are more likely to explain the ubiquity
of business groups around the world.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).