%0 Journal Article %1 RN162 %A Leiva, M.A. %A Morales, S. %A Segura, R. %D 2013 %J Water Air and Soil Pollution %K aas absorption atomic combustion, compliance, dqcauchile emissions, fish, fluorescence impact, in measurement mercury samples, sediments, soil, spectrometry, standards uncertainty, validation, %N 2 %R 10.1007/s11270-012-1390-3 %T Comparative Measurements and Their Compliance with Standards of Total Mercury Analysis in Soil by Cold Vapour and Thermal Decomposition, Amalgamation and Atomic Absorption Spectrometry %U /brokenurl#<Go to ISI>://WOS:000315281300006 %V 224 %X Two methods to measure mercury concentration in soil are compared, and their compliance with international standards is determined: cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry and thermal decomposition, amalgamation and atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The detection limit, quantification limit and uncertainty of these two analytical methods were evaluated and compared. The results indicated that thermal decomposition, amalgamation and atomic absorption spectrophotometry had a lower quantification limit and uncertainty than cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry (quantification limit, 0.27 vs. 0.63 mg kg(-1); expanded uncertainty, 9.30 % vs. 10.8 %, respectively). Thermal decomposition, amalgamation and atomic absorption spectrophotometry allowed the determination of the base values for the concentration of mercury in soil recommended by international standards, achieving a lower detection limit than cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry under the study conditions. In addition, thermal decomposition, amalgamation and atomic absorption spectrophotometry represent a more environmentally friendly alternative for mercury determination because this method uses fewer reagents and therefore generates less waste.

@article{RN162, abstract = {Two methods to measure mercury concentration in soil are compared, and their compliance with international standards is determined: cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry and thermal decomposition, amalgamation and atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The detection limit, quantification limit and uncertainty of these two analytical methods were evaluated and compared. The results indicated that thermal decomposition, amalgamation and atomic absorption spectrophotometry had a lower quantification limit and uncertainty than cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry (quantification limit, 0.27 vs. 0.63 mg kg(-1); expanded uncertainty, 9.30 % vs. 10.8 %, respectively). Thermal decomposition, amalgamation and atomic absorption spectrophotometry allowed the determination of the base values for the concentration of mercury in soil recommended by international standards, achieving a lower detection limit than cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry under the study conditions. In addition, thermal decomposition, amalgamation and atomic absorption spectrophotometry represent a more environmentally friendly alternative for mercury determination because this method uses fewer reagents and therefore generates less waste.}, added-at = {2019-12-04T03:57:35.000+0100}, author = {Leiva, M.A. and Morales, S. and Segura, R.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2fd8f59fc2898ec554943d34c20294b54/dqcauchile}, doi = {10.1007/s11270-012-1390-3}, interhash = {65c5a8638480c26773f3779004cceb95}, intrahash = {fd8f59fc2898ec554943d34c20294b54}, issn = {0049-6979}, journal = {Water Air and Soil Pollution}, keywords = {aas absorption atomic combustion, compliance, dqcauchile emissions, fish, fluorescence impact, in measurement mercury samples, sediments, soil, spectrometry, standards uncertainty, validation,}, number = 2, timestamp = {2019-12-04T03:58:17.000+0100}, title = {Comparative Measurements and Their Compliance with Standards of Total Mercury Analysis in Soil by Cold Vapour and Thermal Decomposition, Amalgamation and Atomic Absorption Spectrometry}, type = {Journal Article}, url = {/brokenurl#<Go to ISI>://WOS:000315281300006}, volume = 224, year = 2013 }