%0 Journal Article %1 ElMasri2013Carbon %A El-Masri, Bassil %A Barman, Rahul %A Meiyappan, Prasanth %A Song, Yang %A Liang, Miaoling %A Jain, Atul K. %D 2013 %J Agricultural and Forest Meteorology %K brazil euporias %P 156--167 %R 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.03.011 %T Carbon dynamics in the Amazonian Basin: Integration of eddy covariance and ecophysiological data with a land surface model %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.03.011 %V 182-183 %X We have evaluated the key model parameters for carbon schemes using the LBA site measurements. We compared the model estimates for vegetation carbon and soil carbon with site measurements. The model results for the carbon fluxes are within the uncertainty range of site measurements. The model is able to tack the variability in carbon fluxes between the LBA sites. Information contained in eddy covariance flux tower data has multiple uses for the development and application of global land surface models, such as evaluation/validation, calibration and process parameterization for carbon stocks and fluxes. In this study, we combine Large Scale Biosphere–Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA) project data collected from a network of eddy covariance flux towers deployed across the Amazonian basin to improve the carbon stocks and flux estimated by a land surface model, the Integrated Science Assessment Model (ISAM). We evaluate the key model parameters for carbon allocation factors, maintenance respiration as well as the autotrophic respiration using the LBA site measurements. Our model results show that the total biomass ranges from 0.7 kg C m−2 yr−1 for the pasture site to 20.8 kg C m−2 yr−1 for the forest site. The ISAM estimates for GPP and NPP are well within the uncertainty range of the site measurement data. Also, the results revealed that all, but one forest site have lower net primary productivity (NPP) to gross primary productivity (GPP) ratio (NPP/GPP = 0.4 compared to the savanna and the pasture sites (NPP/GPP = 0.5). This is because savanna and the pasture sites experienced the longest dry season and plants growing in such environmental conditions have stronger efficiency to store carbon compared to forests. The forest evergreen site (Km67) has a higher measured NPP/GPP ratio (0.5), because of higher carbon accumulation. Soil carbon is lowest for the pasture site (Km77) (7.2 kg C m−2 yr−1) and highest for the forest site (Km34) (12.8 kg C m−2 yr−1). The model results suggest that all the forest sites are a net sink for atmospheric CO2, while the savanna (PDG) and pasture (FNS) sites are neutral and another pasture site (Km77) is net source for atmospheric CO2. Meanwhile, the model results highlight the importance of the LBA site data to improve the model performance for the tropical Amazon region. The study also suggest the need for a network of long-term monitoring plans to measure changes in the vegetation and soil carbon biomass at the local and regional levels. Such programs will be necessary to make reliable global carbon emissions estimates.

@article{ElMasri2013Carbon, abstract = { We have evaluated the key model parameters for carbon schemes using the {LBA} site measurements. We compared the model estimates for vegetation carbon and soil carbon with site measurements. The model results for the carbon fluxes are within the uncertainty range of site measurements. The model is able to tack the variability in carbon fluxes between the {LBA} sites. Information contained in eddy covariance flux tower data has multiple uses for the development and application of global land surface models, such as evaluation/validation, calibration and process parameterization for carbon stocks and fluxes. In this study, we combine Large Scale {Biosphere–Atmosphere} Experiment in Amazonia ({LBA}) project data collected from a network of eddy covariance flux towers deployed across the Amazonian basin to improve the carbon stocks and flux estimated by a land surface model, the Integrated Science Assessment Model ({ISAM}). We evaluate the key model parameters for carbon allocation factors, maintenance respiration as well as the autotrophic respiration using the {LBA} site measurements. Our model results show that the total biomass ranges from 0.7 kg C m−2 yr−1 for the pasture site to 20.8 kg C m−2 yr−1 for the forest site. The {ISAM} estimates for {GPP} and {NPP} are well within the uncertainty range of the site measurement data. Also, the results revealed that all, but one forest site have lower net primary productivity ({NPP}) to gross primary productivity ({GPP}) ratio ({NPP}/{GPP} = 0.4 compared to the savanna and the pasture sites ({NPP}/{GPP} = 0.5). This is because savanna and the pasture sites experienced the longest dry season and plants growing in such environmental conditions have stronger efficiency to store carbon compared to forests. The forest evergreen site (Km67) has a higher measured {NPP}/{GPP} ratio (0.5), because of higher carbon accumulation. Soil carbon is lowest for the pasture site (Km77) (7.2 kg C m−2 yr−1) and highest for the forest site (Km34) (12.8 kg C m−2 yr−1). The model results suggest that all the forest sites are a net sink for atmospheric {CO2}, while the savanna ({PDG}) and pasture ({FNS}) sites are neutral and another pasture site (Km77) is net source for atmospheric {CO2}. Meanwhile, the model results highlight the importance of the {LBA} site data to improve the model performance for the tropical Amazon region. The study also suggest the need for a network of long-term monitoring plans to measure changes in the vegetation and soil carbon biomass at the local and regional levels. Such programs will be necessary to make reliable global carbon emissions estimates.}, added-at = {2019-08-14T18:35:35.000+0200}, author = {El-Masri, Bassil and Barman, Rahul and Meiyappan, Prasanth and Song, Yang and Liang, Miaoling and Jain, Atul K.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b316922ef902e5fa6d4b404f92e4c646/karinawilliams}, citeulike-article-id = {13901106}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.03.011}, doi = {10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.03.011}, interhash = {82a8d4e2e1ef229699e20480e4e400a0}, intrahash = {b316922ef902e5fa6d4b404f92e4c646}, issn = {01681923}, journal = {Agricultural and Forest Meteorology}, keywords = {brazil euporias}, month = dec, pages = {156--167}, posted-at = {2016-01-08 13:53:28}, priority = {2}, timestamp = {2019-08-14T18:35:35.000+0200}, title = {Carbon dynamics in the Amazonian Basin: Integration of eddy covariance and ecophysiological data with a land surface model}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.03.011}, volume = {182-183}, year = 2013 }