Article,

Requiem or New Agenda for Third World Studies?

.
World Politics, 37 (4): 532--561 (July 1985)

Abstract

Neither the developmentalism proposed by American academics in the 1950s and 1960s, nor dependency thinking proposed by radical or nationalist analysts today, offers a satisfactory conceptual perspective from which to study the Third World. What can we learn from the failings of these approaches that can help to guide thinking about the Third World today?

Tags

Users

  • @jrennstich

Comments and Reviews