%0 Journal Article %1 helfen2013negotiating %A Helfen, Markus %A Sydow, Jörg %D 2013 %J Organization Studies %K CSR IFA ILO International_Framework_Agreements corporate_social_responsibility hbs-2008-141-2 institutional_change institutional_work labour_relations negotiation %N 8 %P 1073-1098 %R 10.1177/0170840613492072 %T Negotiating as Institutional Work: The Case of Labour Standards and International Framework Agreements %U http://oss.sagepub.com/content/34/8/1073.abstract %V 34 %X Although institutional work has recently attracted considerable attention from organization research, there is a surprising neglect of inter-organizational negotiations as a form of institutional work. This neglect is astonishing, since negotiations provide a unique opportunity both to study institutional change in settings characterized by diverging institutional logics and to illustrate how institutional constraints and strategic agency are linked in interaction processes. Based on a combination of the literature on institutional work and the theory of strategic negotiations, we examine in detail three illuminating negotiation processes taking place around International Framework Agreements on global labour standards. This examination reveals three types of (proto-)institutional outcomes produced by these processes: institutional creation, modification and stagnation. Whereas institutional creation and modification, albeit differing in quality, show how integrative negotiation practices of global unions might engage management in a joint endeavor for institutional change, institutional stagnation illuminates some of the pitfalls of negotiation work.

@article{helfen2013negotiating, abstract = {Although institutional work has recently attracted considerable attention from organization research, there is a surprising neglect of inter-organizational negotiations as a form of institutional work. This neglect is astonishing, since negotiations provide a unique opportunity both to study institutional change in settings characterized by diverging institutional logics and to illustrate how institutional constraints and strategic agency are linked in interaction processes. Based on a combination of the literature on institutional work and the theory of strategic negotiations, we examine in detail three illuminating negotiation processes taking place around International Framework Agreements on global labour standards. This examination reveals three types of (proto-)institutional outcomes produced by these processes: institutional creation, modification and stagnation. Whereas institutional creation and modification, albeit differing in quality, show how integrative negotiation practices of global unions might engage management in a joint endeavor for institutional change, institutional stagnation illuminates some of the pitfalls of negotiation work.}, added-at = {2014-05-12T09:59:31.000+0200}, author = {Helfen, Markus and Sydow, Jörg}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/294a3c3401fd35e163b1fa4d0c6f1f717/mitbestimmung}, doi = {10.1177/0170840613492072}, eprint = {http://oss.sagepub.com/content/34/8/1073.full.pdf+html}, interhash = {9d3d176ac3724fe2004935481f13a6de}, intrahash = {94a3c3401fd35e163b1fa4d0c6f1f717}, journal = {Organization Studies}, keywords = {CSR IFA ILO International_Framework_Agreements corporate_social_responsibility hbs-2008-141-2 institutional_change institutional_work labour_relations negotiation}, number = 8, pages = {1073-1098}, timestamp = {2014-05-12T10:00:59.000+0200}, title = {Negotiating as Institutional Work: The Case of Labour Standards and International Framework Agreements}, url = {http://oss.sagepub.com/content/34/8/1073.abstract}, volume = 34, year = 2013 }