The degree of interdiseiplinarity observed in the analysis of a research literature can depend on the analytical approach Subject assignments of highly cited journals and those frequently publishing topic-relevant articles are compared with data from a recent survey of neural networks researchers. Publication subject patterns parallel the survey results-concentrating
heavily in the physical sciences and engineering-while the biological and psychological literature is more visible in citation patterns. This finding may reflect both discipline-specific differences in size and publishing patterns and cross-boundary problems in the perceived usefulness of and access to published information.
%0 Journal Article
%1 mccain1994contrasting
%A McCain, Katherine W.
%A Whitney, P.Joy
%D 1994
%J Science Communication
%K interdisziplinarität umfrage zitationsanalyse
%N 3
%P 285-306
%R 10.1177/107554709401500303
%T Contrasting Assessments of Interdisciplinarity in Emerging Specialties
%U http://scx.sagepub.com/content/15/3/285.abstract
%V 15
%X The degree of interdiseiplinarity observed in the analysis of a research literature can depend on the analytical approach Subject assignments of highly cited journals and those frequently publishing topic-relevant articles are compared with data from a recent survey of neural networks researchers. Publication subject patterns parallel the survey results-concentrating
heavily in the physical sciences and engineering-while the biological and psychological literature is more visible in citation patterns. This finding may reflect both discipline-specific differences in size and publishing patterns and cross-boundary problems in the perceived usefulness of and access to published information.
@article{mccain1994contrasting,
abstract = {The degree of interdiseiplinarity observed in the analysis of a research literature can depend on the analytical approach Subject assignments of highly cited journals and those frequently publishing topic-relevant articles are compared with data from a recent survey of neural networks researchers. Publication subject patterns parallel the survey results-concentrating
heavily in the physical sciences and engineering-while the biological and psychological literature is more visible in citation patterns. This finding may reflect both discipline-specific differences in size and publishing patterns and cross-boundary problems in the perceived usefulness of and access to published information.
},
added-at = {2012-04-17T13:55:56.000+0200},
author = {McCain, Katherine W. and Whitney, P.Joy},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20303c0f1dfb9db4b4a8db6b4f175b3e9/wdees},
doi = {10.1177/107554709401500303},
eprint = {http://scx.sagepub.com/content/15/3/285.full.pdf+html},
interhash = {f6107b0c7c824c4b6f12bdc409bd8ca2},
intrahash = {0303c0f1dfb9db4b4a8db6b4f175b3e9},
journal = {Science Communication},
keywords = {interdisziplinarität umfrage zitationsanalyse},
number = 3,
pages = {285-306},
timestamp = {2012-04-17T13:55:56.000+0200},
title = {Contrasting Assessments of Interdisciplinarity in Emerging Specialties},
url = {http://scx.sagepub.com/content/15/3/285.abstract},
volume = 15,
year = 1994
}