Abstract
Numerous national research assessment policies set the goal of promoting
"excellence" and incentivise scholars to publish their research in the most
prestigious journals or with the most prestigious book publishers. We
investigate the practicalities of the assessment of book outputs based on the
prestige of book publishers (Denmark, Finland, Flanders, Lithuania, Norway).
Additionally, we test whether such assessments are transparent and yield
consistent results. We show inconsistencies in the assessment of publishers,
such as the same publisher being ranked as prestigious and not so prestigious
in different countries or in different years in the same country. Likewise, we
find that verification of compliance with the mandatory prerequisites is not
always possible because of the lack of transparency. Our findings raise doubts
about whether the assessment of books based on a judgement about their
publisher yields acceptable outcomes. Currently used rankings of publishers
focus on evaluating the gatekeeping role of publishers but do not assess their
dissemination role. Our suggestion for future research is to develop approaches
for assessing books which consider both quality control and the distribution of
books (and their metadata) as measured by the importance of communication
between researchers. That means that publishers should be transparent about the
services they deliver in both areas, preferably at the level of individual
books, so that there is no need to rely on general information about
publishers.
Description
[2008.06008] Prestige of scholarly book publishers: an investigation into criteria, processes, and practices across countries
Links and resources
Tags
community