Lethal Treachery and the Imbalance of Power in Warfare and Feuding
R. Wadley. Journal of Anthropological Research, 59 (4):
531--554(2003)
Abstract
Lethal treachery is distinguished by the necessity of deceptively peaceful social interaction between attacker and victim immediately prior to an assault. Aggressors may make deliberate plans to attack opponents during peacemaking ceremonies or fall opportunistically upon noncombatants during seemingly friendly encounters. As with other forms of ambush, the tactic increases the vulnerability of victims while reducing that of the attackers. Ethnographic data from a cross-cultural survey show that lethal treachery has been an occasional, though very successful, tactic in armed conflicts but has been a generally overlooked aspect of warfare and feuding. Its consistency with Wrangham's problematical imbalance-of-power hypothesis is only apparent and is assessed with regard to conventional animal conflict models.
%0 Journal Article
%1 200324
%A Wadley, Reed L.
%D 2003
%I University of New Mexico
%J Journal of Anthropological Research
%K anthropology comparative_study warfare
%N 4
%P 531--554
%T Lethal Treachery and the Imbalance of Power in Warfare and Feuding
%U http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0091-7710%28200324%2959%3A4%3C531%3ALTATIO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-U
%V 59
%X Lethal treachery is distinguished by the necessity of deceptively peaceful social interaction between attacker and victim immediately prior to an assault. Aggressors may make deliberate plans to attack opponents during peacemaking ceremonies or fall opportunistically upon noncombatants during seemingly friendly encounters. As with other forms of ambush, the tactic increases the vulnerability of victims while reducing that of the attackers. Ethnographic data from a cross-cultural survey show that lethal treachery has been an occasional, though very successful, tactic in armed conflicts but has been a generally overlooked aspect of warfare and feuding. Its consistency with Wrangham's problematical imbalance-of-power hypothesis is only apparent and is assessed with regard to conventional animal conflict models.
@article{200324,
abstract = {Lethal treachery is distinguished by the necessity of deceptively peaceful social interaction between attacker and victim immediately prior to an assault. Aggressors may make deliberate plans to attack opponents during peacemaking ceremonies or fall opportunistically upon noncombatants during seemingly friendly encounters. As with other forms of ambush, the tactic increases the vulnerability of victims while reducing that of the attackers. Ethnographic data from a cross-cultural survey show that lethal treachery has been an occasional, though very successful, tactic in armed conflicts but has been a generally overlooked aspect of warfare and feuding. Its consistency with Wrangham's problematical imbalance-of-power hypothesis is only apparent and is assessed with regard to conventional animal conflict models.},
added-at = {2007-02-05T17:08:51.000+0100},
author = {Wadley, Reed L.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21e48e210f426918d224bf3ba05d31e9f/iblis},
copyright = {Copyright 2003 University of New Mexico},
interhash = {135a5bfdef02cae4d5454f7a97c4975b},
intrahash = {1e48e210f426918d224bf3ba05d31e9f},
issn = {0091-7710},
journal = {Journal of Anthropological Research},
jstor_articletype = {Full Length Article},
jstor_date = {200324},
jstor_formatteddate = {Winter, 2003},
keywords = {anthropology comparative_study warfare},
number = 4,
pages = {531--554},
publisher = {University of New Mexico},
timestamp = {2007-02-05T17:08:51.000+0100},
title = {Lethal Treachery and the Imbalance of Power in Warfare and Feuding},
url = {http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0091-7710%28200324%2959%3A4%3C531%3ALTATIO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-U},
volume = 59,
year = 2003
}