UML models and OWL ontologies constitute modeling approaches with
different strength and weaknesses that make them appropriate for
use of specifying different aspects of software systems. In particular,
OWL ontologies are well suited to specify classes using an expressive
logical language with highly flexible, dynamic and polymorphic class
membership, while UML diagrams are much more suitable for specifying
not only static models including classes and associations, but also
dynamic behavior. Though MOF based metamodels and UML profiles for
OWL have been proposed in the past, an integrated use of both modeling
approaches in a coherent framework has been lacking so far. We present
such a framework, TwoUse, for developing integrated models, comprising
the benefits of UML models and OWL ontologies
%0 Report
%1 SilvaParreiras2007TIU
%A Parreiras, Fernando Silva
%A Staab, Steffen
%A Winter, Andreas
%D 2007
%K ocl ocl-dl owl twouse uml
%N 16/2007
%T TwoUse Integrating UML Models and OWL Ontologies
%U http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~aggrimm/arbeitsberichte/arbeitsberichte_16_2007.pdf
%X UML models and OWL ontologies constitute modeling approaches with
different strength and weaknesses that make them appropriate for
use of specifying different aspects of software systems. In particular,
OWL ontologies are well suited to specify classes using an expressive
logical language with highly flexible, dynamic and polymorphic class
membership, while UML diagrams are much more suitable for specifying
not only static models including classes and associations, but also
dynamic behavior. Though MOF based metamodels and UML profiles for
OWL have been proposed in the past, an integrated use of both modeling
approaches in a coherent framework has been lacking so far. We present
such a framework, TwoUse, for developing integrated models, comprising
the benefits of UML models and OWL ontologies
@techreport{SilvaParreiras2007TIU,
abstract = {UML models and OWL ontologies constitute modeling approaches with
different strength and weaknesses that make them appropriate for
use of specifying different aspects of software systems. In particular,
OWL ontologies are well suited to specify classes using an expressive
logical language with highly flexible, dynamic and polymorphic class
membership, while UML diagrams are much more suitable for specifying
not only static models including classes and associations, but also
dynamic behavior. Though MOF based metamodels and UML profiles for
OWL have been proposed in the past, an integrated use of both modeling
approaches in a coherent framework has been lacking so far. We present
such a framework, TwoUse, for developing integrated models, comprising
the benefits of UML models and OWL ontologies},
added-at = {2010-08-02T16:45:53.000+0200},
author = {Parreiras, Fernando Silva and Staab, Steffen and Winter, Andreas},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/230001e2a33c38a02c55f2e240ff2de0c/fparreiras},
institution = {Universit�t Koblenz-Landau},
interhash = {101f35acd95c57b5d30cde832d4818b0},
intrahash = {30001e2a33c38a02c55f2e240ff2de0c},
keywords = {ocl ocl-dl owl twouse uml},
note = {Technical Report},
number = {16/2007},
owner = {Parreiras},
timestamp = {2010-08-02T16:45:54.000+0200},
title = {TwoUse Integrating UML Models and OWL Ontologies},
url = {http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~aggrimm/arbeitsberichte/arbeitsberichte_16_2007.pdf},
year = 2007
}