This paper examines the way papal rhetoric made use of the image and reputation of the city of Constantinople in order to legitimise and incite support for its crusading calls for the defence of the Latin empire after 1204. A number of relevant themes that reflect the city’s temporal and religious importance are explored, such as its wealth, its relics, its imperial past and its patriarchal status as New Rome. The differences of emphasis and occasional omissions of such arguments provide insights as to what was expected to motivate the audience, while also revealing the papacy’s priorities.
Chrissis_2012_The City and the Cross.pdf:/Users/stockhausen/Sync/Bibliographie/storage/VH6BS5IW/Chrissis_2012_The City and the Cross.pdf:application/pdf
%0 Journal Article
%1 chrissis_city_2012
%A Chrissis, Nikolaos G
%D 2012
%J Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies
%K 1204 Konstantinopel Kreuzzüge
%N 1
%P 20--37
%R doi:10.1179/030701312X13238617305572
%T The City and the Cross: the image of Constantinople and the Latin empire in thirteenth-century papal crusading rhetoric
%V 36
%X This paper examines the way papal rhetoric made use of the image and reputation of the city of Constantinople in order to legitimise and incite support for its crusading calls for the defence of the Latin empire after 1204. A number of relevant themes that reflect the city’s temporal and religious importance are explored, such as its wealth, its relics, its imperial past and its patriarchal status as New Rome. The differences of emphasis and occasional omissions of such arguments provide insights as to what was expected to motivate the audience, while also revealing the papacy’s priorities.
@article{chrissis_city_2012,
abstract = {This paper examines the way papal rhetoric made use of the image and reputation of the city of Constantinople in order to legitimise and incite support for its crusading calls for the defence of the Latin empire after 1204. A number of relevant themes that reflect the city’s temporal and religious importance are explored, such as its wealth, its relics, its imperial past and its patriarchal status as New Rome. The differences of emphasis and occasional omissions of such arguments provide insights as to what was expected to motivate the audience, while also revealing the papacy’s priorities.},
added-at = {2012-09-30T11:11:07.000+0200},
author = {Chrissis, Nikolaos G},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/274e303f3facdbfe50c475850eea0ee95/avs},
doi = {doi:10.1179/030701312X13238617305572},
file = {Chrissis_2012_The City and the Cross.pdf:/Users/stockhausen/Sync/Bibliographie/storage/VH6BS5IW/Chrissis_2012_The City and the Cross.pdf:application/pdf},
interhash = {0ee2c17c6544c87704a3da4d4e5b0f59},
intrahash = {74e303f3facdbfe50c475850eea0ee95},
journal = {Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies},
keywords = {1204 Konstantinopel Kreuzzüge},
number = 1,
pages = {20--37},
timestamp = {2012-09-30T11:11:24.000+0200},
title = {The City and the Cross: the image of Constantinople and the Latin empire in thirteenth-century papal crusading rhetoric},
volume = 36,
year = 2012
}