%0 Journal Article %1 RefWorks:80 %A Gupta, A. K. %A Sinha, R. %A Koradia, D. %A Patel, R. %A Parmar, M. %A Rohit, P. %A Patel, H. %A Patel, K. %A Chand, V. S. %A James, T. J. %D 2003/11 %J Futures %K imported %N 9 %P 975-987 %T Mobilizing grassroots' technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: articulating social and ethical capital %V 35 %X The Honey Bee Network has helped provide a sort of loose platform to converge creative, but uncoordinated individuals across not only Indian states having varying cultural, linguistic and social ethos, but also in 75 other countries around the world. What the Network is trying to do in a rather quiet manner may transform the way the resources--in which poor people are rich--are used in the future. These resources are their knowledge, innovations and sustainable practices.I first argue that the classical concept of social capital does not distinguish between the trust in society created for social good versus social `bad'. For instance, the trust among members of the mafia and other socially undesirable networks does not constitute social capital. I am also trying to emphasize that part of social trust which is guided by higher ethical values which may not have become social norms as yet. This is being characterized as ethical capital. Finally, I conclude that the Honey Bee Network has tried to articulate the social and the ethical capital of society at the grassroots to demonstrate how local individuals and communities are trying to solve local problems without any outside help.

@article{RefWorks:80, abstract = {The Honey Bee Network has helped provide a sort of loose platform to converge creative, but uncoordinated individuals across not only Indian states having varying cultural, linguistic and social ethos, but also in 75 other countries around the world. What the Network is trying to do in a rather quiet manner may transform the way the resources--in which poor people are rich--are used in the future. These resources are their knowledge, innovations and sustainable practices.I first argue that the classical concept of social capital does not distinguish between the trust in society created for social good versus social `bad'. For instance, the trust among members of the mafia and other socially undesirable networks does not constitute social capital. I am also trying to emphasize that part of social trust which is guided by higher ethical values which may not have become social norms as yet. This is being characterized as ethical capital. Finally, I conclude that the Honey Bee Network has tried to articulate the social and the ethical capital of society at the grassroots to demonstrate how local individuals and communities are trying to solve local problems without any outside help.}, added-at = {2010-09-05T22:59:08.000+0200}, author = {Gupta, A. K. and Sinha, R. and Koradia, D. and Patel, R. and Parmar, M. and Rohit, P. and Patel, H. and Patel, K. and Chand, V. S. and James, T. J.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21c805c19402feea2784e85c4d8c2e7e7/jomiralb}, interhash = {274f1733587643cacbd2c9c2aa0fb258}, intrahash = {1c805c19402feea2784e85c4d8c2e7e7}, journal = {Futures}, keywords = {imported}, number = 9, pages = {975-987}, timestamp = {2010-09-05T22:59:11.000+0200}, title = {Mobilizing grassroots' technological innovations and traditional knowledge, values and institutions: articulating social and ethical capital}, volume = 35, year = {2003/11} }