%0 Journal Article %1 HW00 %A Hokanson, M. %A Wirth, B. %D 2000 %J Int J Emerg Ment Health %K myown %N 4 %P 249-57 %T The critical incident stress debriefing process for the Los Angeles County Fire Department: automatic and effective. %V 2 %X Los Angeles County Fire Department has one of the oldest Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM) programs in the country. One core component for the LACoFD has been the Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD). Two important questions for the emergency managers are: 1) Do individuals find a significant difference in symptom reduction for events that were debriefed? 2) Does helpfulness of a debriefing for a specific individual correlate with recommending the process for others? A Department-wide evaluative survey was conducted in 1996 to determine the satisfaction and effectiveness of the debriefing program. Individuals reported a significant difference in the speed of symptom reduction for incidents that were debriefed versus incidents that were not debriefed. The majority of individuals would recommend the debriefing process to others regardless of whether they personally found the process helpful or not. Based on this, the recommendations are to continue the debriefing process for specific events and to make the process mandatory; furthermore, it is recommended that the term "mandatory" be changed to äutomatic." By using the term äutomatic," debriefings become standard operating procedures. By doing so, a method to protect the psychological welfare of emergency personnel becomes as automatic as putting on safety protection equipment International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 2000, 2(4), 249-257.

@article{HW00, abstract = {Los Angeles County Fire Department has one of the oldest Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM) programs in the country. One core component for the LACoFD has been the Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD). Two important questions for the emergency managers are: 1) Do individuals find a significant difference in symptom reduction for events that were debriefed? 2) Does helpfulness of a debriefing for a specific individual correlate with recommending the process for others? A Department-wide evaluative survey was conducted in 1996 to determine the satisfaction and effectiveness of the debriefing program. Individuals reported a significant difference in the speed of symptom reduction for incidents that were debriefed versus incidents that were not debriefed. The majority of individuals would recommend the debriefing process to others regardless of whether they personally found the process helpful or not. Based on this, the recommendations are to continue the debriefing process for specific events and to make the process mandatory; furthermore, it is recommended that the term "mandatory" be changed to "automatic." By using the term "automatic," debriefings become standard operating procedures. By doing so, a method to protect the psychological welfare of emergency personnel becomes as automatic as putting on safety protection equipment [International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 2000, 2(4), 249-257].}, added-at = {2010-08-13T18:00:00.000+0200}, at = {2010-08-12T19:36:31.000+0200}, author = {Hokanson, M. and Wirth, B.}, authoraddress = {Los Angeles, Fire Department, 1320 North Eastern Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90063-3294, USA.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ddc8f7594c2885a27d4480f567fbc654/referrator}, interhash = {27566dbf4e51a72cd3a8a39efbf7f86f}, intrahash = {ddc8f7594c2885a27d4480f567fbc654}, journal = {Int J Emerg Ment Health}, keywords = {myown}, language = {eng}, medline = {2001/03/17 10:01}, number = 4, pages = {249-57}, timestamp = {2010-08-13T18:00:00.000+0200}, title = {The critical incident stress debriefing process for the {L}os {A}ngeles {C}ounty {F}ire {D}epartment: automatic and effective.}, volume = 2, year = 2000 }