We offer a defence of, and framework for, comparative research in industrial and employment relations, based on a long-term engagement with the social contexts under study. We locate ‘slow’ research strategies in relation to predominant approaches and establish a number of basic precepts of slow comparativism as a practical methodological approach. We aim to provoke a discussion among those conducting comparative research on work and employment about how truth claims are generated. We also seek a basis by which those conducting slower forms of comparativism, through what we term ‘implicit ethnographies’, can find better ways of developing and defending their modes of research within an often hostile academic political economy.
%0 Journal Article
%1 almond2019manifesto
%A Almond, Phil
%A Connolly, Heather
%D 2019
%I SAGE Publications
%J European Journal of Industrial Relations
%K comparative_industrial_relations comparative_methodology slow_scholarship sociology_of_work
%N 1
%P 59--74
%R 10.1177/0959680119834164
%T A manifesto for `slow' comparative research on work and employment
%U https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0959680119834164
%V 26
%X We offer a defence of, and framework for, comparative research in industrial and employment relations, based on a long-term engagement with the social contexts under study. We locate ‘slow’ research strategies in relation to predominant approaches and establish a number of basic precepts of slow comparativism as a practical methodological approach. We aim to provoke a discussion among those conducting comparative research on work and employment about how truth claims are generated. We also seek a basis by which those conducting slower forms of comparativism, through what we term ‘implicit ethnographies’, can find better ways of developing and defending their modes of research within an often hostile academic political economy.
@article{almond2019manifesto,
abstract = {We offer a defence of, and framework for, comparative research in industrial and employment relations, based on a long-term engagement with the social contexts under study. We locate ‘slow’ research strategies in relation to predominant approaches and establish a number of basic precepts of slow comparativism as a practical methodological approach. We aim to provoke a discussion among those conducting comparative research on work and employment about how truth claims are generated. We also seek a basis by which those conducting slower forms of comparativism, through what we term ‘implicit ethnographies’, can find better ways of developing and defending their modes of research within an often hostile academic political economy.},
added-at = {2020-02-24T10:03:36.000+0100},
author = {Almond, Phil and Connolly, Heather},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/276b04f7d75fcb04f708053041462f4bd/meneteqel},
doi = {10.1177/0959680119834164},
interhash = {a1ee9d77fe6b60af9d454347d983b74f},
intrahash = {76b04f7d75fcb04f708053041462f4bd},
journal = {European Journal of Industrial Relations},
keywords = {comparative_industrial_relations comparative_methodology slow_scholarship sociology_of_work},
language = {eng},
month = mar,
number = 1,
pages = {59--74},
publisher = {{SAGE} Publications},
timestamp = {2020-02-24T10:03:36.000+0100},
title = {A manifesto for `slow' comparative research on work and employment},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0959680119834164},
volume = 26,
year = 2019
}