%0 Journal Article %1 cha2002measurement %A Cha, Jae-Eun %A Ahn, Yeh-Chan %A Kim, Moo-Hwan %D 2002 %J Flow Measurement and Instrumentation %K 76-05-fluid-mechanics-experimental-work 76t10-liquid-gas-two-phase-flows-bubbly-flows 76w05-magnetohydrodynamics-electrohydrodynamics %N 5 %P 329-339 %R https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(02)00007-9 %T Flow measurement with an electromagnetic flowmeter in two-phase bubbly and slug flow regimes %U https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955598602000079 %V 12 %X In order to investigate the characteristics of an electromagnetic flowmeter in two-phase flow, an alternating-current electromagnetic flowmeter was designed and manufactured. The signals and noise from the flowmeter under various flow conditions were obtained, and analyzed in comparison with the flow patterns observed with a high-speed charge-coupled device camera. An experiment with void simulators, in which a rod-shaped non-conducting material was used, was carried out to investigate the effect of bubble position and void fraction on the flowmeter. Two-phase flow experiments, encompassing bubbly to slug flow regimes, were conducted with a water–air mixture. The simple relation ΔUTP=ΔUSP/(1−α), relating the flowmeter signal between single-phase flow and two-phase flow, was verified with measurements of the potential difference and the void fraction for a bubbly flow regime. Due to the lack of homogeneity in a real two-phase flow, the discrepancy between the relation and the present measurement increased slightly with increasing void fraction and superficial liquid velocity jf. Whereas there is no difference in the shape of the raw signal between single-phase flow and bubbly flow, the signal amplitude for bubbly flow is higher than that for single-phase flow at the same water flow rate, since the passage area of the water flow is reduced. In the case of slug flow, the phase and the amplitude of the flowmeter output show dramatically the flow characteristics around each slug bubble and the position of the slug bubble itself. Therefore, the electromagnetic flowmeter shows a good possibility of being useful for identifying the flow regimes.

@article{cha2002measurement, abstract = {In order to investigate the characteristics of an electromagnetic flowmeter in two-phase flow, an alternating-current electromagnetic flowmeter was designed and manufactured. The signals and noise from the flowmeter under various flow conditions were obtained, and analyzed in comparison with the flow patterns observed with a high-speed charge-coupled device camera. An experiment with void simulators, in which a rod-shaped non-conducting material was used, was carried out to investigate the effect of bubble position and void fraction on the flowmeter. Two-phase flow experiments, encompassing bubbly to slug flow regimes, were conducted with a water–air mixture. The simple relation ΔUTP=ΔUSP/(1−α), relating the flowmeter signal between single-phase flow and two-phase flow, was verified with measurements of the potential difference and the void fraction for a bubbly flow regime. Due to the lack of homogeneity in a real two-phase flow, the discrepancy between the relation and the present measurement increased slightly with increasing void fraction and superficial liquid velocity jf. Whereas there is no difference in the shape of the raw signal between single-phase flow and bubbly flow, the signal amplitude for bubbly flow is higher than that for single-phase flow at the same water flow rate, since the passage area of the water flow is reduced. In the case of slug flow, the phase and the amplitude of the flowmeter output show dramatically the flow characteristics around each slug bubble and the position of the slug bubble itself. Therefore, the electromagnetic flowmeter shows a good possibility of being useful for identifying the flow regimes.}, added-at = {2024-03-11T05:39:18.000+0100}, author = {Cha, Jae-Eun and Ahn, Yeh-Chan and Kim, Moo-Hwan}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/27b5506d86ad518dc2719ee977a65f4e0/gdmcbain}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(02)00007-9}, interhash = {793dab93f35310dc0b838e0908d1482b}, intrahash = {7b5506d86ad518dc2719ee977a65f4e0}, issn = {0955-5986}, journal = {Flow Measurement and Instrumentation}, keywords = {76-05-fluid-mechanics-experimental-work 76t10-liquid-gas-two-phase-flows-bubbly-flows 76w05-magnetohydrodynamics-electrohydrodynamics}, number = 5, pages = {329-339}, timestamp = {2024-03-11T05:39:18.000+0100}, title = {Flow measurement with an electromagnetic flowmeter in two-phase bubbly and slug flow regimes}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955598602000079}, volume = 12, year = 2002 }