%0 Journal Article %1 1991EnMan..15..475S %A Schroeder, P. %D 1991 %J Environmental Management %K CO2 Douglas_fir Pinus_taeda Pseudotsuga_menziesii carbon_storage fertilization forest intensive_management loblolly_pine simulation thinning %P 475-481 %R 10.1007/BF02394738 %T Can intensive management increase carbon storage in forests? %V 15 %X A possible response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration is to attempt to increase the amount of carbon stored in terrestrial vegetation. One approach to increasing the size of the terrestrial carbon sink is to increase the growth of forests by utilizing intensive forest management practices. This article uses data from the literature and from forest growth and yield models to analyze the impact of three management practices on carbon storage: thinning, fertilization, and control of competing vegetation. Using Douglas-fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii) and loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda) as example species, results from experiments with computer simulation models suggest that, for these two species, thinning generally does not increase carbon storage and may actually cause a decrease. The exception is thinning of very dense young stands. Fertilization generally increases carbon storage, although the response can be quite variable. The largest gains in carbon storage are likely to come from fertilizing lower-quality sites and from fertilizing thinned or less dense stands. Forests usually show increased growth in response to fertilization over a wide range of ages. Simulation of the growth of loblolly pine indicates that controlling competing vegetation at an early age helps to maximize stand growth and carbon storage.

@article{1991EnMan..15..475S, abstract = {A possible response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration is to attempt to increase the amount of carbon stored in terrestrial vegetation. One approach to increasing the size of the terrestrial carbon sink is to increase the growth of forests by utilizing intensive forest management practices. This article uses data from the literature and from forest growth and yield models to analyze the impact of three management practices on carbon storage: thinning, fertilization, and control of competing vegetation. Using Douglas-fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii) and loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda) as example species, results from experiments with computer simulation models suggest that, for these two species, thinning generally does not increase carbon storage and may actually cause a decrease. The exception is thinning of very dense young stands. Fertilization generally increases carbon storage, although the response can be quite variable. The largest gains in carbon storage are likely to come from fertilizing lower-quality sites and from fertilizing thinned or less dense stands. Forests usually show increased growth in response to fertilization over a wide range of ages. Simulation of the growth of loblolly pine indicates that controlling competing vegetation at an early age helps to maximize stand growth and carbon storage.}, added-at = {2008-05-17T02:57:11.000+0200}, adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}, adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991EnMan..15..475S}, author = {{Schroeder}, P.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28334ebdab64b05d015dbbe573cc1ef4d/thulefoth}, description = {Can intensive management increase carbon storage in forests?}, doi = {10.1007/BF02394738}, interhash = {1108e0da9ced14431aa300a2dc3a0c04}, intrahash = {8334ebdab64b05d015dbbe573cc1ef4d}, journal = {Environmental Management}, keywords = {CO2 Douglas_fir Pinus_taeda Pseudotsuga_menziesii carbon_storage fertilization forest intensive_management loblolly_pine simulation thinning}, month = {July}, pages = {475-481}, timestamp = {2008-05-17T02:57:11.000+0200}, title = {{Can intensive management increase carbon storage in forests?}}, volume = 15, year = 1991 }