Wikipedia is a large and rapidly growing Web-based collaborative authoring environment, where anyone on the Internet can create, modify, and delete pages about encyclopedic topics. A remarkable property of some Wikipedia pages is that they are written by up to thousands of authors who may have contradicting opinions. In this paper, we show that a visual analysis of the 'who revises whom'-network gives deep insight into controversies. We propose a set of analysis and visualization techniques that reveal the dominant authors of a page, the roles they play, and the alters they confront. Thereby we provide tools to understand how Wikipedia authors collaborate in the presence of controversy.
Online PDF Version:http\://www.bibsonomy.org/documents/26e6950a22658dc7898e0c7d46227b0f:PDF;Offline PDF Version:E\:\\Anne\\Eigene Dateien\\Research\\Visual analysis of controversy in user-generated encyclopedias (IVS08).pdf:PDF
description
IngentaConnect Visual analysis of controversy in user-generated encyclopedias
%0 Journal Article
%1 Brandes:2008:1473-8716:34
%A Brandes, Ulrik
%A Lerner, Jürgen
%D 2008
%J Information Visualization
%K Wikipedia authoring controversy social-network-analysis visualization
%P 34-48(15)
%R doi:10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500171
%T Visual analysis of controversy in user-generated encyclopedias
%U http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500171
%V 7
%X Wikipedia is a large and rapidly growing Web-based collaborative authoring environment, where anyone on the Internet can create, modify, and delete pages about encyclopedic topics. A remarkable property of some Wikipedia pages is that they are written by up to thousands of authors who may have contradicting opinions. In this paper, we show that a visual analysis of the 'who revises whom'-network gives deep insight into controversies. We propose a set of analysis and visualization techniques that reveal the dominant authors of a page, the roles they play, and the alters they confront. Thereby we provide tools to understand how Wikipedia authors collaborate in the presence of controversy.
@article{Brandes:2008:1473-8716:34,
abstract = {Wikipedia is a large and rapidly growing Web-based collaborative authoring environment, where anyone on the Internet can create, modify, and delete pages about encyclopedic topics. A remarkable property of some Wikipedia pages is that they are written by up to thousands of authors who may have contradicting opinions. In this paper, we show that a visual analysis of the 'who revises whom'-network gives deep insight into controversies. We propose a set of analysis and visualization techniques that reveal the dominant authors of a page, the roles they play, and the alters they confront. Thereby we provide tools to understand how Wikipedia authors collaborate in the presence of controversy.},
added-at = {2009-02-09T18:12:04.000+0100},
author = {Brandes, Ulrik and Lerner, Jürgen},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2abe5f89190676cebb5cb38930a82b6f9/anneba},
description = {IngentaConnect Visual analysis of controversy in user-generated encyclopedias},
doi = {doi:10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500171},
file = {Online PDF Version:http\://www.bibsonomy.org/documents/26e6950a22658dc7898e0c7d46227b0f:PDF;Offline PDF Version:E\:\\Anne\\Eigene Dateien\\Research\\Visual analysis of controversy in user-generated encyclopedias (IVS08).pdf:PDF},
interhash = {362f2dc7956ddfba5e2bdc416c900353},
intrahash = {abe5f89190676cebb5cb38930a82b6f9},
journal = {Information Visualization},
keywords = {Wikipedia authoring controversy social-network-analysis visualization},
pages = {34-48(15)},
timestamp = {2009-02-09T18:14:28.000+0100},
title = {Visual analysis of controversy in user-generated encyclopedias},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500171},
volume = 7,
year = 2008
}