A study conducted for the (United Kingdom) Joint Information Systems Committee reviewed possible models for implementing Open Access to research reports in institutional archives and Open Access journals. The conclusion was that a "harvesting model," in which full texts reside on the original servers but metadata are harvested, held, and enhanced by a central service, was preferable to either a centralized national service or a completely decentralized service for the UK. The study included issues of populating institutional archives (IAs) and some form of mandatory archiving for publicly funded research results to obtain a critical mass of Open Access material in such a system.
%0 Journal Article
%1 citeulike:72142
%A Rowland, Fytton
%A Swan, Alma
%A Needham, Paul
%A Probets, Steve
%A Muir, Adrienne
%A Oppenheim, Charles
%A O'Brien, Ann
%A Hardy, Rachel
%D 2004
%J Serials Review
%K e-prints open_journal_system
%N 4
%P 298--303
%R 10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.006
%T Delivery, Management and Access Model for E_prints and Open Access Journals
%U http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.006
%V 30
%X A study conducted for the (United Kingdom) Joint Information Systems Committee reviewed possible models for implementing Open Access to research reports in institutional archives and Open Access journals. The conclusion was that a "harvesting model," in which full texts reside on the original servers but metadata are harvested, held, and enhanced by a central service, was preferable to either a centralized national service or a completely decentralized service for the UK. The study included issues of populating institutional archives (IAs) and some form of mandatory archiving for publicly funded research results to obtain a critical mass of Open Access material in such a system.
@article{citeulike:72142,
abstract = {A study conducted for the (United Kingdom) Joint Information Systems Committee reviewed possible models for implementing Open Access to research reports in institutional archives and Open Access journals. The conclusion was that a "harvesting model," in which full texts reside on the original servers but metadata are harvested, held, and enhanced by a central service, was preferable to either a centralized national service or a completely decentralized service for the UK. The study included issues of populating institutional archives (IAs) and some form of mandatory archiving for publicly funded research results to obtain a critical mass of Open Access material in such a system.},
added-at = {2007-11-22T18:12:11.000+0100},
author = {Rowland, Fytton and Swan, Alma and Needham, Paul and Probets, Steve and Muir, Adrienne and Oppenheim, Charles and O'Brien, Ann and Hardy, Rachel},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ac555a5821b07daadff8c888b17c29dd/jsicot},
citeulike-article-id = {72142},
doi = {10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.006},
interhash = {54502298c871e1d9e8c74d138ff82b50},
intrahash = {ac555a5821b07daadff8c888b17c29dd},
journal = {Serials Review},
keywords = {e-prints open_journal_system},
number = 4,
pages = {298--303},
priority = {2},
timestamp = {2007-11-23T12:10:23.000+0100},
title = {Delivery, Management and Access Model for E_prints and Open Access Journals},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.006},
volume = 30,
year = 2004
}