We consider several preconditioners for the pressure Schur complement of the discrete steady Oseen problem. Two of the preconditioners are well known from the literature and the other is new. Supplemented with an appropriate approximate solve for an auxiliary velocity subproblem, these approaches give rise to a family of the block preconditioners for the matrix of the discrete Oseen system. In the paper we critically review possible advantages and difficulties of using various Schur complement preconditioners. We recall existing eigenvalue bounds for the preconditioned Schur complement and prove such for the newly proposed preconditioner. These bounds hold both for LBB stable and stabilized finite elements. Results of numerical experiments for several model two-dimensional and three-dimensional problems are presented. In the experiments we use LBB stable finite element methods on uniform triangular and tetrahedral meshes. One particular conclusion is that in spite of essential improvement in comparison with ” simple” scaled mass-matrix preconditioners in certain cases, none of the considered approaches provides satisfactory convergence rates in the case of small viscosity coefficients and a sufficiently complex (e.g., circulating) advection vector field.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Olshanskii2007Pressure
%A Olshanskii, Maxim A.
%A Vassilevski, Yuri V.
%D 2007
%J SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
%K 65f08-preconditioners-for-iterative-methods 65f10-iterative-methods-for-linear-systems 65f50-sparse-matrices 65n22-pdes-bvps-solution-of-discretized-equations 76d07-stokes-and-related-oseen-etc-flows 76m10-finite-element-methods-in-fluid-mechanics
%N 6
%P 2686--2704
%R 10.1137/070679776
%T Pressure Schur Complement Preconditioners for the Discrete Oseen Problem
%U http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/070679776
%V 29
%X We consider several preconditioners for the pressure Schur complement of the discrete steady Oseen problem. Two of the preconditioners are well known from the literature and the other is new. Supplemented with an appropriate approximate solve for an auxiliary velocity subproblem, these approaches give rise to a family of the block preconditioners for the matrix of the discrete Oseen system. In the paper we critically review possible advantages and difficulties of using various Schur complement preconditioners. We recall existing eigenvalue bounds for the preconditioned Schur complement and prove such for the newly proposed preconditioner. These bounds hold both for LBB stable and stabilized finite elements. Results of numerical experiments for several model two-dimensional and three-dimensional problems are presented. In the experiments we use LBB stable finite element methods on uniform triangular and tetrahedral meshes. One particular conclusion is that in spite of essential improvement in comparison with ” simple” scaled mass-matrix preconditioners in certain cases, none of the considered approaches provides satisfactory convergence rates in the case of small viscosity coefficients and a sufficiently complex (e.g., circulating) advection vector field.
@article{Olshanskii2007Pressure,
abstract = {{We consider several preconditioners for the pressure Schur complement of the discrete steady Oseen problem. Two of the preconditioners are well known from the literature and the other is new. Supplemented with an appropriate approximate solve for an auxiliary velocity subproblem, these approaches give rise to a family of the block preconditioners for the matrix of the discrete Oseen system. In the paper we critically review possible advantages and difficulties of using various Schur complement preconditioners. We recall existing eigenvalue bounds for the preconditioned Schur complement and prove such for the newly proposed preconditioner. These bounds hold both for LBB stable and stabilized finite elements. Results of numerical experiments for several model two-dimensional and three-dimensional problems are presented. In the experiments we use LBB stable finite element methods on uniform triangular and tetrahedral meshes. One particular conclusion is that in spite of essential improvement in comparison with ” simple” scaled mass-matrix preconditioners in certain cases, none of the considered approaches provides satisfactory convergence rates in the case of small viscosity coefficients and a sufficiently complex (e.g., circulating) advection vector field.}},
added-at = {2019-03-01T00:11:50.000+0100},
author = {Olshanskii, Maxim A. and Vassilevski, Yuri V.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ad28ecac039b9d85f75736c858a8c55a/gdmcbain},
citeulike-article-id = {14581778},
citeulike-attachment-1 = {olshanskii_07_pressure.pdf; /pdf/user/gdmcbain/article/14581778/1136056/olshanskii_07_pressure.pdf; 0ffd1cd07a23a37ebe29fac99e3f39591eed51ed},
citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/070679776},
comment = {Cited for the PCD (pressure–convection–diffusion) preconditioner implemented in 'FENaPack':http://fenapack.readthedocs.io},
doi = {10.1137/070679776},
file = {olshanskii_07_pressure.pdf},
interhash = {dce2ad25567a42e7cb8adb2770b681d5},
intrahash = {ad28ecac039b9d85f75736c858a8c55a},
issn = {1064-8275},
journal = {SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing},
keywords = {65f08-preconditioners-for-iterative-methods 65f10-iterative-methods-for-linear-systems 65f50-sparse-matrices 65n22-pdes-bvps-solution-of-discretized-equations 76d07-stokes-and-related-oseen-etc-flows 76m10-finite-element-methods-in-fluid-mechanics},
month = jan,
number = 6,
pages = {2686--2704},
posted-at = {2018-05-07 00:31:32},
priority = {5},
timestamp = {2019-03-01T00:11:50.000+0100},
title = {Pressure {S}chur Complement Preconditioners for the Discrete {O}seen Problem},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/070679776},
volume = 29,
year = 2007
}