C. Reed, and D. Long. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98), page 1091--1097. Montreal, Canada, (1998)
Abstract
This paper demonstrates that generating arguments in natural language requires planning at an abstract level, and that the appropriate abstraction cannot be captured by approaches based solely upon coherence relations. An abstraction based planning system is presented which employs operators motivated by empirical study and rhetorical maxims. These operators include a subset of traditional deductive rules of inference, argumentation theoretic rules of refutation, and inductive reasoning patterns. The paper presents a unified system in which the various argument forms are employed in generating rich, complex structures for persuasive text.
Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98)
year
1998
pages
1091--1097
posted-at
2005-03-04 12:43:48
priority
0
citeulike-article-id
113884
citeulike-linkout-1
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/267423.html
comment
(private-note)Formal description of some operators for planning argumentation:<ul><li>deductive rules of inference</li><li>theoric rules of refutation</li><li>inductive reasoning patterns</li></ul>
%0 Conference Paper
%1 reed98generating
%A Reed, Chris A.
%A Long, Derek P.
%B Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98)
%C Montreal, Canada
%D 1998
%E Hoeppner, W.
%K argument, generation, phd-bibtex-import
%P 1091--1097
%T Generating the Structure of Argument
%U http://citeseer.lcs.mit.edu/267423.html
%X This paper demonstrates that generating arguments in natural language requires planning at an abstract level, and that the appropriate abstraction cannot be captured by approaches based solely upon coherence relations. An abstraction based planning system is presented which employs operators motivated by empirical study and rhetorical maxims. These operators include a subset of traditional deductive rules of inference, argumentation theoretic rules of refutation, and inductive reasoning patterns. The paper presents a unified system in which the various argument forms are employed in generating rich, complex structures for persuasive text.
@inproceedings{reed98generating,
abstract = {{This paper demonstrates that generating arguments in natural language requires planning at an abstract level, and that the appropriate abstraction cannot be captured by approaches based solely upon coherence relations. An abstraction based planning system is presented which employs operators motivated by empirical study and rhetorical maxims. These operators include a subset of traditional deductive rules of inference, argumentation theoretic rules of refutation, and inductive reasoning patterns. The paper presents a unified system in which the various argument forms are employed in generating rich, complex structures for persuasive text.}},
added-at = {2010-12-17T18:47:41.000+0100},
address = {Montreal, Canada},
author = {Reed, Chris A. and Long, Derek P.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b6c15ce49e5a4f7f342a55a8f4cbb9ac/mortimer_m8},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL98)},
citeulike-article-id = {113884},
citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://citeseer.lcs.mit.edu/267423.html},
citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/267423.html},
comment = {(private-note)Formal description of some operators for planning argumentation:<ul><li>deductive rules of inference</li><li>theoric rules of refutation</li><li>inductive reasoning patterns</li></ul>},
editor = {Hoeppner, W.},
interhash = {1ce183e03886d3143757ec434d296caf},
intrahash = {b6c15ce49e5a4f7f342a55a8f4cbb9ac},
keywords = {argument, generation, phd-bibtex-import},
pages = {1091--1097},
posted-at = {2005-03-04 12:43:48},
priority = {0},
timestamp = {2010-12-20T11:11:25.000+0100},
title = {{Generating the Structure of Argument}},
url = {http://citeseer.lcs.mit.edu/267423.html},
year = 1998
}