@miki

Faint progenitors of luminous $z 6$ quasars: why don't we see them?

, , , , , and . (2016)cite arxiv:1612.04188Comment: 12 pages, 9 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS.
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw3243

Abstract

Observational searches for faint active nuclei at $z > 6$ have been extremely elusive, with a few candidates whose high-$z$ nature is still to be confirmed. Interpreting this lack of detections is crucial to improve our understanding of high-$z$ supermassive black holes (SMBHs) formation and growth. In this work, we present a model for the emission of accreting BHs in the X-ray band, taking into account super-Eddington accretion, which can be very common in gas-rich systems at high-$z$. We compute the spectral energy distribution for a sample of active galaxies simulated in a cosmological context, which represent the progenitors of a $z 6$ SMBH with $M_BH 10^9 \, M_ødot$. We find an average Compton thick fraction of $45\%$ and large typical column densities ($N_H 10^23 \, cm^2$). However, faint progenitors are still luminous enough to be detected in the X-ray band of current surveys. Even accounting for a maximum obscuration effect, the number of detectable BHs is reduced at most by a factor 2. In our simulated sample, observations of faint quasars are mainly limited by their very low active fraction ($f_act \sim 1 \%$), which is the result of short, super-critical growth episodes. We suggest that to detect high-$z$ SMBHs progenitors, large area surveys with shallower sensitivities, such as Cosmos Legacy and XMM-LSS+XXL, are to be preferred with respect to deep surveys probing smaller fields, such as CDF-S.

Description

[1612.04188] Faint progenitors of luminous $z \sim 6$ quasars: why don't we see them?

Links and resources

Tags