%0 Journal Article %1 suriadi2012current %A Suriadi, S. %A Weiß, B. %A Winkelmann, A. %A ter Hofstede, A.H.M. %A Adams, M. %A Conforti, R. %A Fidge, C. %A Rosa, M. La %A Ouyang, C. %A Rosemann, M. %A Pika, A. %A Wynn, M. %D 2014 %I Association for Information Systems %J Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS) %K imported %N 1 %P 933-984 %T Current Research in Risk-Aware Business Process Management - Overview, Comparison and Gap Analysis %U http://bpmcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/reports/2012/BPM-12-13.pdf %V 34 %X The management of risks in business processes has been a subject of active research in the past few years. Many benefits can potentially be obtained by integrating the two traditionally-separated fields of risk management and business process management, including the ability to minimize risks in business processes (by design) and to mitigate risks at run time. In the past few years, an increasing amount of research aimed at delivering such an integrated system has been proposed. However, these research efforts vary in terms of their scope, goals, and functionality. Through systematic collection and evaluation of relevant literature, this paper compares and classifies current approaches in the area of risk-aware business process management in order to identify and explain relevant research gaps. The process through which relevant literature is collected, filtered, and evaluated is also detailed.

@article{suriadi2012current, abstract = {The management of risks in business processes has been a subject of active research in the past few years. Many benefits can potentially be obtained by integrating the two traditionally-separated fields of risk management and business process management, including the ability to minimize risks in business processes (by design) and to mitigate risks at run time. In the past few years, an increasing amount of research aimed at delivering such an integrated system has been proposed. However, these research efforts vary in terms of their scope, goals, and functionality. Through systematic collection and evaluation of relevant literature, this paper compares and classifies current approaches in the area of risk-aware business process management in order to identify and explain relevant research gaps. The process through which relevant literature is collected, filtered, and evaluated is also detailed.}, added-at = {2013-01-30T12:41:38.000+0100}, author = {Suriadi, S. and Weiß, B. and Winkelmann, A. and ter Hofstede, A.H.M. and Adams, M. and Conforti, R. and Fidge, C. and Rosa, M. La and Ouyang, C. and Rosemann, M. and Pika, A. and Wynn, M.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/24851b3a6eaf06a383982a469617410d6/winkelmann}, interhash = {ac08a646756a01dabdd773cb385e5515}, intrahash = {4851b3a6eaf06a383982a469617410d6}, journal = {Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS)}, keywords = {imported}, month = {January}, number = 1, pages = {933-984}, publisher = {Association for Information Systems}, timestamp = {2014-07-01T20:44:28.000+0200}, title = {Current Research in Risk-Aware Business Process Management - Overview, Comparison and Gap Analysis}, url = {http://bpmcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/reports/2012/BPM-12-13.pdf}, volume = 34, year = 2014 }