Misc,

Revisiting a negative cosmological constant in light of low-redshift data

, , and .
(2019)cite arxiv:1907.07953Comment: 14 pages, 1 table containing 6 figures.

Abstract

Persisting tensions between high-redshift and low-redshift precision cosmological observations suggest the dark energy sector of the Universe might be more complex than the positive cosmological constant of the $Łambda$CDM model, and in particular might have a negative energy density. Motivated by string theory considerations, wherein consistent AdS background are ubiquitous, we explore a scenario where the dark energy sector consists of two components: a negative cosmological constant, with a dark energy component with equation of state $w_\phi$ on top. We test the consistency of the model against low-redshift Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and Type Ia Supernovae distance measurements, assessing two alternative choices of distance anchors: the sound horizon at baryon drag $r_drag$ determined by the Planck collaboration, and the Hubble constant $H_0$ determined by the SH0ES program. We find no evidence for a negative cosmological constant, and mild indications for an effective phantom dark energy component on top. A model comparison analysis performed through the Akaike information criterion reveals the $Łambda$CDM model is favoured over our negative cosmological constant model. While our results are inconclusive, should low-redshift tensions persist with future data, it would be worth reconsidering and further refining our toy negative cosmological constant model.

Tags

Users

  • @citekhatri

Comments and Reviews