%0 Journal Article %1 tanadini_population_2011 %A Tanadini, Lorenzo G. %A Schmidt, Benedikt R. %D 2011 %J PLoS ONE %K N-mixture amphibians, citizen detectability, dynamics model, population science, %N 12 %P e28244 %R 10.1371/journal.pone.0028244 %T Population Size Influences Amphibian Detection Probability: Implications for Biodiversity Monitoring Programs %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028244 %V 6 %X Monitoring is an integral part of species conservation. Monitoring programs must take imperfect detection of species into account in order to be reliable. Theory suggests that detection probability may be determined by population size but this relationship has not yet been assessed empirically. Population size is particularly important because it may induce heterogeneity in detection probability and thereby cause bias in estimates of biodiversity. We used a site occupancy model to analyse data from a volunteer-based amphibian monitoring program to assess how well different variables explain variation in detection probability. An index to population size best explained detection probabilities for four out of six species (to avoid circular reasoning, we used the count of individuals at a previous site visit as an index to current population size). The relationship between the population index and detection probability was positive. Commonly used weather variables best explained detection probabilities for two out of six species. Estimates of site occupancy probabilities differed depending on whether the population index was or was not used to model detection probability. The relationship between the population index and detectability has implications for the design of monitoring and species conservation. Most importantly, because many small populations are likely to be overlooked, monitoring programs should be designed in such a way that small populations are not overlooked. The results also imply that methods cannot be standardized in such a way that detection probabilities are constant. As we have shown here, one can easily account for variation in population size in the analysis of data from long-term monitoring programs by using counts of individuals from surveys at the same site in previous years. Accounting for variation in population size is important because it can affect the results of long-term monitoring programs and ultimately the conservation of imperiled species.

@article{tanadini_population_2011, abstract = {Monitoring is an integral part of species conservation. Monitoring programs must take imperfect detection of species into account in order to be reliable. Theory suggests that detection probability may be determined by population size but this relationship has not yet been assessed empirically. Population size is particularly important because it may induce heterogeneity in detection probability and thereby cause bias in estimates of biodiversity. We used a site occupancy model to analyse data from a volunteer-based amphibian monitoring program to assess how well different variables explain variation in detection probability. An index to population size best explained detection probabilities for four out of six species (to avoid circular reasoning, we used the count of individuals at a previous site visit as an index to current population size). The relationship between the population index and detection probability was positive. Commonly used weather variables best explained detection probabilities for two out of six species. Estimates of site occupancy probabilities differed depending on whether the population index was or was not used to model detection probability. The relationship between the population index and detectability has implications for the design of monitoring and species conservation. Most importantly, because many small populations are likely to be overlooked, monitoring programs should be designed in such a way that small populations are not overlooked. The results also imply that methods cannot be standardized in such a way that detection probabilities are constant. As we have shown here, one can easily account for variation in population size in the analysis of data from long-term monitoring programs by using counts of individuals from surveys at the same site in previous years. Accounting for variation in population size is important because it can affect the results of long-term monitoring programs and ultimately the conservation of imperiled species.}, added-at = {2017-01-09T13:57:26.000+0100}, author = {Tanadini, Lorenzo G. and Schmidt, Benedikt R.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b28d0d06aa2a59cb93302fcaf82011f2/yourwelcome}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0028244}, interhash = {51f5753a58def2245ea05f5be7da9c49}, intrahash = {b28d0d06aa2a59cb93302fcaf82011f2}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, keywords = {N-mixture amphibians, citizen detectability, dynamics model, population science,}, month = dec, number = 12, pages = {e28244}, shorttitle = {Population {Size} {Influences} {Amphibian} {Detection} {Probability}}, timestamp = {2017-01-09T14:01:11.000+0100}, title = {Population {Size} {Influences} {Amphibian} {Detection} {Probability}: {Implications} for {Biodiversity} {Monitoring} {Programs}}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028244}, urldate = {2012-03-27}, volume = 6, year = 2011 }