Article,

Testimony and John Locke's Principle of Evidence.

, and .
Journal of Locke Research, (1997)

Abstract

This paper discusses the \textlessEM\textgreaterPrinciple of Evidence\textless/EM\textgreater that Nicholas Wolterstorff attributes to John Locke (in his book \textlessEM\textgreaterJohn Locke and the Ethics of Belief\textless/EM\textgreater, Cambridge: CUP, 1996). That principle tells us to äcquire evidence for and against a proposition such that each item of evidence is something that one knows". We argue that Locke never endorsed this principle. We do so by discussing Locke's views of testimony. As Locke sees it, testimony can be satisfactory evidence even though it does not consist of things one knows. After having argued this point, we comment on how this affects Wolterstorff's over all interpretation of Locke.

Tags

Users

  • @sbbdbs

Comments and Reviews