Misc,

Black hole mass estimates and emission-line properties of a sample of redshift z>6.5 quasars

, , , , , , , , , , , , , and .
(2013)cite arxiv:1311.3260Comment: 21 pages, 11 figures. Submitted to ApJ.

Abstract

We present the analysis of optical and near-infrared spectra of the only four z>6.5 quasars known to date, discovered in the UKIDSS-LAS and VISTA-VIKING surveys. Our data-set consists of VLT/X-Shooter and Magellan/FIRE observations of the z>6.5 quasars, and includes new deep VLT/X-Shooter observations of the highest redshift quasar known to date (z=7.1). These are the best optical/NIR spectroscopic data that are likely to be obtained for the z>6.5 sample using current 6-10 m facilities. We estimate the black hole mass, the Eddington ratio, and the SiIV/CIV, CIII/CIV, and FeII/MgII emission-line flux ratios. We perform spectral modeling using a procedure that allows us to derive a probability distribution for the continuum components and to obtain the quasar properties weighted upon the underlying distribution of continuum models. The z>6.5 quasars show the same emission properties as their counterparts at lower redshifts. The z>6.5 quasars host black holes with masses of ~10^9 M_sun that are accreting close to the Eddington luminosity (<log(L_Bol/L_Edd)>= -0.4+/-0.2), in agreement with what has been observed for a sample of 4.0<z<6.5 quasars. By comparing the SiIV/CIV and CIII/CIV flux ratios with the results obtained from luminosity-matched samples at z~6 and 2<z<4.5, we find no evidence of evolution of the line ratios with cosmic time. We compare the measured FeII/MgII flux ratios with those obtained for a sample of 4.0<z<6.4 sources. The two samples are analyzed using a consistent procedure. The FeII/MgII flux ratio does not show any evolution in the 4.0<z<7.1 redshift range. Under the assumption that the FeII/MgII traces the Fe/Mg abundance ratio, this implies the presence of major episodes of chemical enrichment in the quasar hosts in the first ~0.8 Gyr after the Big Bang.

Tags

Users

  • @miki

Comments and Reviews