Abstract
RESUMEN: La Sentencia de 13 de marzo de 2012 del Tribunal Superior
de Justicia de Madrid, ratifica la validez de un laudo parcial sobre
jurisdicci?n, desestimando la demanda de anulaci?n presentada por
la empresa venezolana Diques y Astilleros Nacionales; le impone a
?sta las costas procesales y declara su temeridad. Sin embargo, lo
realmente llamativo de la Sentencia radica en los argumentos empleados
para sobredimensionar la importancia del Derecho de la sede arbitral
en detrimento del propio Derecho elegido por las partes. ABSTRACT:
The decision of the High Court of Justice of Madrid dated March 13,
2012, ratifies the validity of an interim award on jurisdiction,
dismissing the application for annulment filed by ?DIANCA?; it imposes
legal costs to the company and declares its recklessness. However,
what is really striking in this judgment lies in the arguments used
to overstate the importance of law of the seat of arbitration at
the expense of law itself chosen by the parties.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).