%0 Journal Article %1 Frazier1995 %A Frazier, Lyn %D 1995 %J Journal of Psycholinguistic Research %K psycology sentence article constraint theory linguistics satisfaction %N 6 %P 438--468 %T Constraint Satisfaction as a Theory of Sentence Processing %V 24 %X Various problems with the constraint satisfaction model are discussed. It is argued that the empirical evidence presented in support of the model does not concern predictions of the model that diverge from those of depth-first (one analysis at a time) models. Several methodological problems are also noted. As a theory of sentence processing, the model is inadequate. It fails to account for the assignment of local structure, global structure, structure involving discontinuous dependencies, long-distance dependencies, and adjunct phrases. It makes incorrect predictions about the timing of syntactic analysis. Further, because syntactic structure is available only through activation of syntactic projections stored in the lexical entry of words, the model leaves entirely unexplained the myriad psycholinguistic findings demonstrating independence of lexical and syntactic structure (in Event Related Potential studies, code-switching, pure syntactic priming, etc). Finally, the model is not restrictive or explanatory, providing an account that largely consists of post hoc correlations between frequency counts or subjects' ratings of sentences and processing time data for the same sentences.

@article{Frazier1995, abstract = {Various problems with the constraint satisfaction model are discussed. It is argued that the empirical evidence presented in support of the model does not concern predictions of the model that diverge from those of depth-first (one analysis at a time) models. Several methodological problems are also noted. As a theory of sentence processing, the model is inadequate. It fails to account for the assignment of local structure, global structure, structure involving discontinuous dependencies, long-distance dependencies, and adjunct phrases. It makes incorrect predictions about the timing of syntactic analysis. Further, because syntactic structure is available only through activation of syntactic projections stored in the lexical entry of words, the model leaves entirely unexplained the myriad psycholinguistic findings demonstrating independence of lexical and syntactic structure (in Event Related Potential studies, code-switching, pure syntactic priming, etc). Finally, the model is not restrictive or explanatory, providing an account that largely consists of post hoc correlations between frequency counts or subjects' ratings of sentences and processing time data for the same sentences.}, added-at = {2006-12-01T12:53:04.000+0100}, author = {Frazier, Lyn}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/21d12cb71c5a9546c0123781fc6f7c747/andreab}, interhash = {9778fec489f705949807d367190900f4}, intrahash = {1d12cb71c5a9546c0123781fc6f7c747}, journal = {Journal of Psycholinguistic Research}, keywords = {psycology sentence article constraint theory linguistics satisfaction}, number = 6, pages = {438--468}, school = {Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003, USA.}, timestamp = {2006-12-01T12:53:04.000+0100}, title = {Constraint Satisfaction as a Theory of Sentence Processing}, volume = 24, year = 1995 }