%0 Journal Article %1 Kranczioch:2010:PLoS-One:20174567 %A Kranczioch, C %A Mathews, S %A Dean, P %A Sterr, A %D 2010 %J PLoS One %K analysis cognition eeg movement %N 2 %R 10.1371/journal.pone.0009284 %T Task complexity differentially affects executed and imagined movement preparation: evidence from movement-related potentials %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20174567 %V 5 %X The neural simulation theory predicts similarity for the neural mechanisms subserving overt (motor execution) and covert (movement imagination) actions. Here we tested this prediction for movement preparation, a key characteristic of motor cognition.High-density electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded during covert and overt actions. Movement preparation was studied with a motor priming paradigm, which varied task complexity and amount of advance information. Participants performed simple or complex sequential finger movements either overtly or covertly. Advance information was either fully predictive or partially predictive. Stimulus-locked event-related potential (ERP) data showed the typical pattern of foreperiod activation for overt and covert movements. The foreperiod contingent negative variation (CNV) differed between simple and complex movements only in the execution task. ERP topographies differed between execution and imagination only when advance information was fully predictive.Results suggest a differential contribution of the movement preparation network to action imagination and execution. Overt and covert actions seem to involve similar though not identical mechanisms, where overt actions engage a more fine-grained modulation of covert preparatory states.

@article{Kranczioch:2010:PLoS-One:20174567, abstract = {The neural simulation theory predicts similarity for the neural mechanisms subserving overt (motor execution) and covert (movement imagination) actions. Here we tested this prediction for movement preparation, a key characteristic of motor cognition.High-density electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded during covert and overt actions. Movement preparation was studied with a motor priming paradigm, which varied task complexity and amount of advance information. Participants performed simple or complex sequential finger movements either overtly or covertly. Advance information was either fully predictive or partially predictive. Stimulus-locked event-related potential (ERP) data showed the typical pattern of foreperiod activation for overt and covert movements. The foreperiod contingent negative variation (CNV) differed between simple and complex movements only in the execution task. ERP topographies differed between execution and imagination only when advance information was fully predictive.Results suggest a differential contribution of the movement preparation network to action imagination and execution. Overt and covert actions seem to involve similar though not identical mechanisms, where overt actions engage a more fine-grained modulation of covert preparatory states.}, added-at = {2010-12-18T22:40:23.000+0100}, author = {Kranczioch, C and Mathews, S and Dean, P and Sterr, A}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/275ab704c21f85213707c7dba451ed86a/atzmueller}, description = {Task complexity differentially affects executed an... [PLoS One. 2010] - PubMed result}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0009284}, interhash = {9bb85e39f1bef30f31e219c8dd11e17c}, intrahash = {75ab704c21f85213707c7dba451ed86a}, journal = {PLoS One}, keywords = {analysis cognition eeg movement}, number = 2, pmid = {20174567}, timestamp = {2010-12-18T22:40:23.000+0100}, title = {Task complexity differentially affects executed and imagined movement preparation: evidence from movement-related potentials}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20174567}, volume = 5, year = 2010 }