Abstract
Abstract: I study the evolution of SFAS 142, which uses
unverifiable fair-value estimates to account for acquired goodwill. I
find evidence consistent with the FASB issuing SFAS 142 in response to
political pressure over its proposal to abolish pooling accounting. The
result is interesting given this proposal was due in part to SEC
concerns over pooling misuse. I also find evidence consistent with
lobbying support for SFAS 142 increasing in firms’ discretion under the
standard. Agency theory predicts such unverifiable discretion can be
used opportunistically. Copyright 2008 Elsevier Copyright of Journal of
Accounting & Economics is the property of Elsevier Science Publishing
Company, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple
sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express
written permission. However, users may print, download, or email
articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty
is given about the accuracy of the cop
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).