%0 Journal Article %1 christiansen1975selection %A Christiansen, Freddy Bugge %D 1975 %J The American Naturalist %K population_genetics soft_vs_hard_selection %N 965 %P 11-16 %R 10.1086/282970 %T Hard and Soft Selection in a Subdivided Population %U https://doi.org/10.1086/282970 %V 109 %X Hard and soft selection are compared in a population subdivided into random mating subpopulations. The possibility for protected polymorphism is greater with soft than with hard selection. Protected polymorphism is more readily achieved with increasing isolation, an effect that is more pronounced with hard selection. The results are discussed in relation to selection components.

@article{christiansen1975selection, abstract = { Hard and soft selection are compared in a population subdivided into random mating subpopulations. The possibility for protected polymorphism is greater with soft than with hard selection. Protected polymorphism is more readily achieved with increasing isolation, an effect that is more pronounced with hard selection. The results are discussed in relation to selection components. }, added-at = {2025-02-06T15:28:00.000+0100}, author = {Christiansen, Freddy Bugge}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2fe1fbe2751b2509bb1685b41f3dc83f6/peter.ralph}, doi = {10.1086/282970}, eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1086/282970}, interhash = {b9cae39fbfd4dbad1bf4935bfb9d1c05}, intrahash = {fe1fbe2751b2509bb1685b41f3dc83f6}, journal = {The American Naturalist}, keywords = {population_genetics soft_vs_hard_selection}, number = 965, pages = {11-16}, timestamp = {2025-02-06T15:28:00.000+0100}, title = {Hard and Soft Selection in a Subdivided Population}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1086/282970}, volume = 109, year = 1975 }