Abstract
The link between organizational configurations and performance has
become a central and somewhat controversial focus of research in
the strategic management literature. We statistically aggregated
results from 40 original tests of the configurations-performance
relationship. In contrast to previous qualitative reviews, this meta-analysis
demonstrated that an organization's performance is partially explained
by its configuration. Tests of four potential moderators showed that
organizations' configurations contributed more to performance explanation
to the extent that studies used (1) broad definitions of configurations,
(2) single-industry samples, and (3) longitudinal designs. Results
highlight the need for programmatic research.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).