%0 Journal Article %1 noauthororeditor %A Tricco, Andrea C %A Lillie, Erin %A Zarin, Wasifa %A O'Brien, Kelly K %A Colquhoun, Heather %A Levac, Danielle %A Moher, David %A Peters, Micah D J %A Horsley, Tanya %A Weeks, Laura %A Hempel, Susanne %A Akl, Elie A %A Chang, Christine %A McGowan, Jessie %A Stewart, Lesley %A Hartling, Lisa %A Aldcroft, Adrian %A Wilson, Michael G %A Garritty, Chantelle %A Lewin, Simon %A Godfrey, Christina M %A Macdonald, Marilyn T %A Langlois, Etienne V %A Soares-Weiser, Karla %A Moriarty, Jo %A Clifford, Tammy %A Tunçalp, Özge %A Straus, Sharon E %D 2018 %K guidelines scoping-review %R 10.7326/m18-0850 %m 30178033 %T PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation %X Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.

@article{noauthororeditor, abstract = {Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.}, added-at = {2021-04-30T00:06:06.000+0200}, author = {Tricco, Andrea C and Lillie, Erin and Zarin, Wasifa and O'Brien, Kelly K and Colquhoun, Heather and Levac, Danielle and Moher, David and Peters, Micah D J and Horsley, Tanya and Weeks, Laura and Hempel, Susanne and Akl, Elie A and Chang, Christine and McGowan, Jessie and Stewart, Lesley and Hartling, Lisa and Aldcroft, Adrian and Wilson, Michael G and Garritty, Chantelle and Lewin, Simon and Godfrey, Christina M and Macdonald, Marilyn T and Langlois, Etienne V and Soares-Weiser, Karla and Moriarty, Jo and Clifford, Tammy and Tunçalp, Özge and Straus, Sharon E}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/254924dfd9bbcec14d4306aa596ec1302/ksr4l}, doi = {10.7326/m18-0850 %m 30178033}, interhash = {c96c49f122ebc2edb69bf02cc15701a6}, intrahash = {54924dfd9bbcec14d4306aa596ec1302}, keywords = {guidelines scoping-review}, timestamp = {2021-04-30T00:13:39.000+0200}, title = {PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation}, year = 2018 }