The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time
A. Gelman, and E. Loken. Department of Statistics, Columbia University, (2013)
Please log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).
Cite this publication
More citation styles
- please select -
%0 Journal Article
%1 37
%A Gelman, Andrew
%A Loken, Eric
%D 2013
%J Department of Statistics, Columbia University
%K imported
%T The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time
%V 348
@article{37,
added-at = {2021-05-12T09:28:32.000+0200},
author = {Gelman, Andrew and Loken, Eric},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2855ac31d68d71efd1faf9bd377216ed9/lennartp},
interhash = {df3f3ae92b85281ca4fe9f47b0e7dd7d},
intrahash = {855ac31d68d71efd1faf9bd377216ed9},
journal = {Department of Statistics, Columbia University},
keywords = {imported},
timestamp = {2021-05-12T09:29:24.000+0200},
title = {The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time},
volume = 348,
year = 2013
}