%0 Generic %1 Svrtan2004 %A Svrtan, Dragutin %A Veljan, Darko %A Volenec, Vladimir %D 2004 %K mapping surfaces %T Geometry of pentagons: from Gauss to Robbins %U http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0403503 %X An almost forgotten gem of Gauss tells us how to compute the area of a pentagon by just going around it and measuring areas of each vertex triangles (i.e. triangles whose vertices are three consecutive vertices of the pentagon). We give several proofs and extensions of this beautiful formula to hexagon etc. and consider special cases of affine--regular polygons. The Gauss pentagon formula is, in fact, equivalent to the Monge formula which is equivalent to the Ptolemy formula. On the other hand, we give a new proof of the Robbins formula for the area of a cyclic pentagon in terms of the side lengths, and this is a consequence of the Ptolemy formula. The main tool is simple: just eliminate from algebraic equations, via resultants. By combining Gauss and Robbins formulas we get an explicit rational expression for the area of any cyclic pentagon. So, after centuries of geometry of triangles and quadrilaterals, we arrive to the nontrivial geometry of pentagons.

@misc{Svrtan2004, abstract = { An almost forgotten gem of Gauss tells us how to compute the area of a pentagon by just going around it and measuring areas of each vertex triangles (i.e. triangles whose vertices are three consecutive vertices of the pentagon). We give several proofs and extensions of this beautiful formula to hexagon etc. and consider special cases of affine--regular polygons. The Gauss pentagon formula is, in fact, equivalent to the Monge formula which is equivalent to the Ptolemy formula. On the other hand, we give a new proof of the Robbins formula for the area of a cyclic pentagon in terms of the side lengths, and this is a consequence of the Ptolemy formula. The main tool is simple: just eliminate from algebraic equations, via resultants. By combining Gauss and Robbins formulas we get an explicit rational expression for the area of any cyclic pentagon. So, after centuries of geometry of triangles and quadrilaterals, we arrive to the nontrivial geometry of pentagons. }, added-at = {2010-10-31T16:10:29.000+0100}, author = {Svrtan, Dragutin and Veljan, Darko and Volenec, Vladimir}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2cfc63cf90774a03be92c3e94313cebf5/uludag}, description = {Geometry of pentagons: from Gauss to Robbins}, interhash = {e80373446f28e6b8f6a1ec6bba18d6ca}, intrahash = {cfc63cf90774a03be92c3e94313cebf5}, keywords = {mapping surfaces}, note = {cite arxiv:math/0403503 Comment: 22 pages, 8 figures}, timestamp = {2010-10-31T16:10:29.000+0100}, title = {Geometry of pentagons: from Gauss to Robbins}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0403503}, year = 2004 }