%0 Generic %1 riess2016determination %A Riess, Adam G. %A Macri, Lucas M. %A Hoffmann, Samantha L. %A Scolnic, Dan %A Casertano, Stefano %A Filippenko, Alexei V. %A Tucker, Brad E. %A Reid, Mark J. %A Jones, David O. %A Silverman, Jeffrey M. %A Chornock, Ryan %A Challis, Peter %A Yuan, Wenlong %A Foley, Ryan J. %D 2016 %K constant hubble value %T A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant %U http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.01424 %X We use the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) to reduce the uncertainty in the local value of the Hubble constant (H_0) from 3.3% to 2.4%. Improvements come from observations of Cepheid variables in 10 new hosts of recent SNe~Ia, more than doubling the sample of SNe~Ia having a Cepheid-calibrated distance for a total of 18; these leverage the magnitude-redshift relation based on 300 SNe~Ia at z<0.15. All 18 hosts and the megamaser system NGC4258 were observed with WFC3, thus nullifying cross-instrument zeropoint errors. Other improvements include a 33% reduction in the systematic uncertainty in the maser distance to NGC4258, more Cepheids and a more robust distance to the LMC from late-type DEBs, HST observations of Cepheids in M31, and new HST-based trigonometric parallaxes for Milky Way (MW) Cepheids. We consider four geometric distance calibrations of Cepheids: (i) megamasers in NGC4258, (ii) 8 DEBs in the LMC, (iii) 15 MW Cepheids with parallaxes, and (iv) 2 DEBs in M31. The H_0 from each is 72.39+/-2.56, 71.93+/-2.70, 76.09+/-2.42, and 74.45+/-3.34 km/sec/Mpc, respectively. Our best estimate of 73.03+/-1.79 km/sec/Mpc combines the anchors NGC4258, MW, and LMC, and includes systematic errors for a final uncertainty of 2.4%. This value is 3.0 sigma higher than 67.3+/-0.7 km/sec/Mpc predicted by LambdaCDM with 3 neutrinos with a mass of 0.06 eV and the Planck data, but reduces to 1.9 sigma relative to the prediction of 69.3+/-0.7 km/sec/Mpc with the combination of WMAP+ACT+SPT+BAO, suggesting systematic uncertainties in CMB measurements may play a role in the tension. If we take the conflict between Planck and the H_0 at face value, one plausible explanation could involve an additional source of dark radiation in the early Universe in the range of Delta N_eff=0.4-1. We anticipate significant improvements in H_0 from upcoming parallax measurements.

@misc{riess2016determination, abstract = {We use the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) to reduce the uncertainty in the local value of the Hubble constant (H_0) from 3.3% to 2.4%. Improvements come from observations of Cepheid variables in 10 new hosts of recent SNe~Ia, more than doubling the sample of SNe~Ia having a Cepheid-calibrated distance for a total of 18; these leverage the magnitude-redshift relation based on 300 SNe~Ia at z<0.15. All 18 hosts and the megamaser system NGC4258 were observed with WFC3, thus nullifying cross-instrument zeropoint errors. Other improvements include a 33% reduction in the systematic uncertainty in the maser distance to NGC4258, more Cepheids and a more robust distance to the LMC from late-type DEBs, HST observations of Cepheids in M31, and new HST-based trigonometric parallaxes for Milky Way (MW) Cepheids. We consider four geometric distance calibrations of Cepheids: (i) megamasers in NGC4258, (ii) 8 DEBs in the LMC, (iii) 15 MW Cepheids with parallaxes, and (iv) 2 DEBs in M31. The H_0 from each is 72.39+/-2.56, 71.93+/-2.70, 76.09+/-2.42, and 74.45+/-3.34 km/sec/Mpc, respectively. Our best estimate of 73.03+/-1.79 km/sec/Mpc combines the anchors NGC4258, MW, and LMC, and includes systematic errors for a final uncertainty of 2.4%. This value is 3.0 sigma higher than 67.3+/-0.7 km/sec/Mpc predicted by LambdaCDM with 3 neutrinos with a mass of 0.06 eV and the Planck data, but reduces to 1.9 sigma relative to the prediction of 69.3+/-0.7 km/sec/Mpc with the combination of WMAP+ACT+SPT+BAO, suggesting systematic uncertainties in CMB measurements may play a role in the tension. If we take the conflict between Planck and the H_0 at face value, one plausible explanation could involve an additional source of dark radiation in the early Universe in the range of Delta N_eff=0.4-1. We anticipate significant improvements in H_0 from upcoming parallax measurements.}, added-at = {2016-04-07T11:19:36.000+0200}, author = {Riess, Adam G. and Macri, Lucas M. and Hoffmann, Samantha L. and Scolnic, Dan and Casertano, Stefano and Filippenko, Alexei V. and Tucker, Brad E. and Reid, Mark J. and Jones, David O. and Silverman, Jeffrey M. and Chornock, Ryan and Challis, Peter and Yuan, Wenlong and Foley, Ryan J.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b6e7ebae500d8e4543f9c8b2222f53c3/miki}, description = {[1604.01424] A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant}, interhash = {e9c9a34251d89147a73efbbce3fb20ac}, intrahash = {b6e7ebae500d8e4543f9c8b2222f53c3}, keywords = {constant hubble value}, note = {cite arxiv:1604.01424Comment: submitted to ApJ, 63 pages, 16 figures, 8 tables}, timestamp = {2016-04-07T11:19:50.000+0200}, title = {A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.01424}, year = 2016 }