%0 Journal Article %1 Mowery2002 %A Mowery, David C. %A Ziedonis, Arvids A.A. %D 2002 %I Elsevier %J Research Policy %K Act,Patents Bayh-Dole US universities,Raise,USA,UniversityPerformance %N 3 %P 399--418 %T Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States %U http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733301001160 %V 31 %X This paper summarizes the results of empirical analyses of data on the characteristics of the pre- and post-1980 patents of three leading US academic patenters—the University of California, Stanford University, and Columbia University. We complement the analysis of these institutions with an analysis of the characteristics of the patents issued to all US universities before and after 1980. Our analysis suggests that the effects of the Bayh–Dole act on the content of academic research and patenting at Stanford and the University of California were modest. The most significant change in the content of research at these universities, one associated with increased patenting and licensing at both universities before and after 1980, was the rise of biomedical research and inventive activity, but Bayh–Dole had little to do with this growth. Both UC and Stanford University administrators intensified their efforts to market faculty inventions in the wake of Bayh–Dole. This enlargement of the pool of marketed inventions appears to have reduced the commercial “yield” of this population at both universities. But we find no decline in the “importance” or “generality” of the post-1980 patents of these two universities. The analysis of overall US university patenting suggests that the patents issued to institutions that entered into patenting and licensing after the effective date of the Bayh–Dole act are indeed less important and less general than the patents issued before and after 1980 to US universities with longer experience in patenting. Inexperienced academic patenters appear to have obtained patents that proved to be less significant (in terms of the rate and breadth of their subsequent citations) than those issuing to more experienced university patenters. Bayh–Dole’s effects on entry therefore may be as important as any effects of the act on the internal “research culture” of US universities in explaining any decline in the importance and generality of US academic patents after 1980.

@article{Mowery2002, abstract = {This paper summarizes the results of empirical analyses of data on the characteristics of the pre- and post-1980 patents of three leading US academic patenters—the University of California, Stanford University, and Columbia University. We complement the analysis of these institutions with an analysis of the characteristics of the patents issued to all US universities before and after 1980. Our analysis suggests that the effects of the Bayh–Dole act on the content of academic research and patenting at Stanford and the University of California were modest. The most significant change in the content of research at these universities, one associated with increased patenting and licensing at both universities before and after 1980, was the rise of biomedical research and inventive activity, but Bayh–Dole had little to do with this growth. Both UC and Stanford University administrators intensified their efforts to market faculty inventions in the wake of Bayh–Dole. This enlargement of the pool of marketed inventions appears to have reduced the commercial “yield” of this population at both universities. But we find no decline in the “importance” or “generality” of the post-1980 patents of these two universities. The analysis of overall US university patenting suggests that the patents issued to institutions that entered into patenting and licensing after the effective date of the Bayh–Dole act are indeed less important and less general than the patents issued before and after 1980 to US universities with longer experience in patenting. Inexperienced academic patenters appear to have obtained patents that proved to be less significant (in terms of the rate and breadth of their subsequent citations) than those issuing to more experienced university patenters. Bayh–Dole’s effects on entry therefore may be as important as any effects of the act on the internal “research culture” of US universities in explaining any decline in the importance and generality of US academic patents after 1980.}, added-at = {2012-02-27T06:11:36.000+0100}, author = {Mowery, David C. and Ziedonis, Arvids A.A.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2138021789659f2007fb217650df4b0cb/kamil205}, file = {:Users/Miguel/Dropbox/Escola/Artigos/Mowery, Ziedonis\_2002\_Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States.pdf:pdf}, interhash = {eb29b742cae48b18ccd74e95cf73aef7}, intrahash = {138021789659f2007fb217650df4b0cb}, journal = {Research Policy}, keywords = {Act,Patents Bayh-Dole US universities,Raise,USA,UniversityPerformance}, mendeley-tags = {Raise,USA,UniversityPerformance}, number = 3, pages = {399--418}, publisher = {Elsevier}, timestamp = {2012-02-27T06:12:07.000+0100}, title = {{Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States}}, url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733301001160}, volume = 31, year = 2002 }