Incollection,

Statics and dynamics of a sparsely connected oscillator network

, and .
Abstract Book of the XXIII IUPAP International Conference on Statistical Physics, Genova, Italy, (9-13 July 2007)

Abstract

0.3cmWe study interacting systems where the network of interactions between the different units is of a sparse, random and often complex nature 1. Among the many and varied models of this type, we have a particular interest in systems where elements have their own dynamics, i.e. the nodes of the network are dynamic objects themselves. 0.3cmAs an example, we have been studying a dynamical system model of the immune network . In this model, each element or node is composed of a number of B-cells and antibodies with the same idiotype (i.e. they have the same antigen 'detector') - this subunit is called a clone. The dynamics of a given clone is described by a pair of ordinary differential equations. 0.3cmOne particular feature of the immune system is that each clone interacts with only a finite number of other clones irrespective of the number of clones (i.e. number of idiotypes in the system), $N$. This property allows protection against a wide range of antigen, with antigen of a specific type only having a 'local' effect on the entire immune network. We have derived a partial differential equation to describe the population of B-cells and antibodies by using the dynamical replica theory2. However, this model is rather complicated and is difficult to analyze theoretically. It is desirable to study a model in which each element has a dynamical nature is simple enough to be able to analyze theoretically. 0.3cmIn this talk, as an example of such a tractable system, we discuss $N$ coupled phase oscillators as introduced by Kuramoto3. In this model, each oscillator has a definite amplitude, and the state of a given oscillator is described by its phase $R$. The evolution equation for phase $\phi_i$ of $i$-th oscillator is given by eqnarray ddt \phi_i &=& _i + \sum_j i J_ij\sin(\phi_j - \phi_i) + _i, eq:phi eqnarray where $\eta_i(t)$ is Gaussian white noise with variance $2T$. 0.3cmThe system simplifies in the case where $ømega_i=ømega$ for any $i$ and where $J_ij=J_ji$. Then eq. (1) can be rewritten (in the frame of reference moving with angular velocity $ømega$) as eqnarray ddt \phi_i &=& - \partial\phi_i H + _i,\\ H & = & - \sum_i<j J_ij\cos(\phi_i - \phi_j). eqnarray These assumptions allow us to investigate a Hamiltonian system. 0.3cmFirst, we focus on the following result of Ichimomiya4: the sparse random network with finite connectivity behaves similarly to a fully connected model with disordered bonds. The quenched Gaussian disordered bonds can be seen to have a similar effect on the system to the random number of connections in a sparse system. 0.3cmBy restricting ourselves to this Hamiltonian subcase, we are able to examine Ichinomiya's result analytically in the regime of finite $c$ comparing phase diagrams and the order parameters in these models. Further, we perform numerical simulations and compare our theoretical and numerical results. 0.3cmWe then tackle the more challenging dynamical relaxation behaviour of this system. By using a maximum entropy assumption we are able to gain some analytic control of the overall system behaviour and we investigate the distribution of the phases as the system relaxes.\\ 1) S. Dorgovtsev and J.F.F Mendes Evolution of networks: From Biological Nets to the internet and WWW Oxford University Press, 2003\\ 2) T. Uezu, C. Kadono, J.P.L. Hatchett and A.C.C. Coolen Prog. Theo. Phys. Supp. 161 pp. 385-388, 2006\\ 3) Y. Kuramoto Chemical waves, Oscillations and Turbulence Springer-Verlag, 1984\\ 4) T. Ichinomiya Phys. Rev. E 72 016109, 2005

Tags

Users

  • @statphys23

Comments and Reviews