Anyone who thinks peer review is a process of nudges and winks from your mates has never faced the harsh reality of having your work pulled apart, says Jenny Rohn (who has).
Just a small number of bad referees can significantly undermine the ability of the peer-review system to select the best scientific papers. That is according to a pair of complex systems researchers in Austria who have modelled an academic publishing system and showed that human foibles can have a dramatic effect on the quality of published science.
If you think research and knowledge are as vital to humanity as air, water, bread and freedom, then you probably know what Peer Evaluation is about.
Peer Evaluation is about giving Open Access to your primary data, working papers, articles, media and having them all reviewed and discussed by your peers. Peer evaluation is a strong supporter of qualified peer reviewing and is, in that respect, a valuable supplement, inspiration and hub for peer reviewed journals and publications. Finally, Peer Evaluation is an independent and community interest project.
Dekita advocates participatory uses of Web applications in EFL/ESL teaching; we favor open approaches to language learning in which students get to engage the public Web instead of being locked into narrowly circumscribed online spaces. *** nice descript
To create communities of researchers reviewing and labeling papers in their field. These communities could be entitled Peer Community in xxx, e.g. Peer Community in Evolution, Peer Community in microbiology.
A. Ghumare, N. Patil, C. Holkar, и V. Badgujar. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 3 (1):
175--180(января 2015)
Y. Simmhan, B. Plale, и D. Gannon. Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience, Special Issue
on The First Provenance Challenge, 20 (5):
441--451(апреля 2008)IF 0.636, CORE A.
S. Harnad. Exploit Interactive, (мая 2000)Earlier Shorter version: Harnad, S. (1998) The invisible hand of peer review. Nature online (c. 5 Nov. 1998) http://helix.nature.com/webmatters/invisible/invisible.html Longer version: Harnad, S. (2000) The Invisible Hand of Peer Review, Exploit Interactive, issue 5, April 2000 <http://www.exploit-lib.org/>: http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/\char126harnad/nature2.html http://www.princeton.edu/\char126harnad/nature2.html.