Proper nutrition is important as children grow, and snack time should be just as healthy and delicious as breakfast, lunch and dinner. The study aimed to evaluate the vitamin and mineral composition of four processed snack foods and to analyze the % RNI contributed by these foods to the daily needs of school children. Moreover, the researchers attempted to identify the most concentrated sources of vitamin B1, vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, vitamin B9, calcium, and iron among the snack items.
I. Lu, and M. Mantei. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported
Cooperative Work, page 97-112. Springer, (1991)Setting: Supported Process: Design Process in small teams (distributed)
=> Sketching is important for design processses => Group sketching
with shared drawing tools
Fokus: Idea Management in shared drawing tools.
Motivation: No own empirical results. Argumentation is based on results
of other studies that characterize the design process as chaotic
=> need for management.
Goal: Architecture for idea management in shared drawing tools
Methodical Approach: Research Studies on Group Design Activities and
Design Methodology => Collect Group Behavior Data => Study and Understand
to generate a taxonomy of group idea management processes => Derive
user Requiremets for supporting group idea management => Develop
architecture (CaveDraw)
Results: - Taxonomy of group idea management processes (list of recurring
process patterns): * Agree and add on the suggested idea * Agree
and subdivide the suggested idea * Modify the suggested idea * Scratch
and restart * Agree and wait * Compare and consolidate * Deprivatize
design ideas
- CaveDraw shared drawing package - Layer-based - All users can work
on different layers on the same time. - Pointer to point on items
- Definition of five critical factors for idea management (argumentation
unknown): * Work Allocation: split between individual and group,
personal design space? * Design Integration: how can data from the
personal space be integrated * Design Ownership: * Design Recall:
Undo-possibilites, versioning * Space Sharing: amount of workspace
is limited, if a big group acts on the workspace, the space can quickly
be full. - User Requirements drawn from taxonomy:
- Drawing of user requirements from each of the critical factors perspectives
- Argumentation that a layer based-approach satisfies the user requirements..
I. Lu, and M. Mantei. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, page 97-112. Springer, (1991)Setting: Supported Process: Design Process in small teams (distributed)
=> Sketching is important for design processses => Group sketching
with shared drawing tools
Fokus: Idea Management in shared drawing tools.
Motivation: No own empirical results. Argumentation is based on results
of other studies that characterize the design process as chaotic
=> need for management.
Goal: Architecture for idea management in shared drawing tools
Methodical Approach: Research Studies on Group Design Activities and
Design Methodology => Collect Group Behavior Data => Study and Understand
to generate a taxonomy of group idea management processes => Derive
user Requiremets for supporting group idea management => Develop
architecture (CaveDraw)
Results: - Taxonomy of group idea management processes (list of recurring
process patterns): * Agree and add on the suggested idea * Agree
and subdivide the suggested idea * Modify the suggested idea * Scratch
and restart * Agree and wait * Compare and consolidate * Deprivatize
design ideas
- CaveDraw shared drawing package - Layer-based - All users can work
on different layers on the same time. - Pointer to point on items
- Definition of five critical factors for idea management (argumentation
unknown): * Work Allocation: split between individual and group,
personal design space? * Design Integration: how can data from the
personal space be integrated * Design Ownership: * Design Recall:
Undo-possibilites, versioning * Space Sharing: amount of workspace
is limited, if a big group acts on the workspace, the space can quickly
be full. - User Requirements drawn from taxonomy:
- Drawing of user requirements from each of the critical factors perspectives
- Argumentation that a layer based-approach satisfies the user requirements..
I. Lu, and M. Mantei. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, page 97-112. Springer, (1991)Setting:
Supported Process: Design Process in small teams (distributed)
=> Sketching is important for design processses
=> Group sketching with shared drawing tools
Fokus:
Idea Management in shared drawing tools.
Motivation:
No own empirical results. Argumentation is based on results of other studies that characterize the design process as chaotic => need for management.
Goal: Architecture for idea management in shared drawing tools
Methodical Approach:
Research Studies on Group Design Activities and Design Methodology => Collect Group Behavior Data => Study and Understand to generate a taxonomy of group idea management processes => Derive user Requiremets for supporting group idea management => Develop architecture (CaveDraw)
Results:
- Taxonomy of group idea management processes (list of recurring process patterns):
* Agree and add on the suggested idea
* Agree and subdivide the suggested idea
* Modify the suggested idea
* Scratch and restart
* Agree and wait
* Compare and consolidate
* Deprivatize design ideas
- CaveDraw shared drawing package
- Layer-based
- All users can work on different layers on the same time.
- Pointer to point on items
- Definition of five critical factors for idea management (argumentation unknown):
* Work Allocation: split between individual and group, personal design space?
* Design Integration: how can data from the personal space be integrated
* Design Ownership:
* Design Recall: Undo-possibilites, versioning
* Space Sharing: amount of workspace is limited, if a big group acts on the workspace, the space can quickly be full.
- User Requirements drawn from taxonomy:
- Drawing of user requirements from each of the critical factors perspectives
- Argumentation that a layer based-approach satisfies the user requirements..