In Belgium, where euthanasia was legalized in 2002, we conducted a follow-up study in 2007 to two largescale nationwide surveys on medical end-of-life practices that had been conducted in 1998 and 2001. This follow-up study enabled us to investigate differences in the frequency and characteristics of these practices before and after the enactment of the law.
Artsen moeten na het melden van euthanasie steeds vaker lang wachten op een oordeel van de regionale toetsingscommissie euthanasie. De KNMG roept VWS op om te garanderen dat vanaf 2012 de wettelijke toegestane termijn niet meer wordt overschreden. Artsen verkeren na het melden van euthanasie steeds vaker onnodig lang in onzekerheid over de uitkomst van de toetsing van hun euthanasiemelding. Tot 2007 was de wachttijd zo'n 30 dagen, maar de wettelijke termijn van maximaal twee keer zes weken wordt steeds forser overschreden. Dit loopt soms op tot meer dan een half jaar, zo hoort de KNMG van artsen. Een reportage in actualiteitenprogramma EenVandaag laat zien dat veel artsen dit probleem ervaren.
Washington’s Death with Dignity Act allows adult residents in the state with six months (180 days) or less to live to request lethal doses of medication from physicians. In this report, a participant of the act is defined as someone to whom medication was dispensed under the terms of this law. This report focuses on the 103 participants for whom medication was dispensed between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011. It includes data from the documentation received by the Department of Health as of February 29, 2012.
This article examines the reporting requirements in four jurisdictions in which assisted dying (euthanasia and/or assisted suicide) is legally regulated: the Netherlands, Belgium, Oregon and Switzerland. These jurisdictions were chosen because each had a substantial amount of empirical evidence available. We assess the available empirical evidence on reporting and what it tells us about the effectiveness of such requirements in encouraging reporting. We also look at the nature of requirements on regulatory bodies to refer cases not meeting the legal criteria to either prosecutorial or disciplinary authorities. We assess the evidence available on the outcomes of reported cases, including the rate of referral and the ultimate disposition of referred cases.