bookmark

What is a life worth living? Further analysis of “M” – Daniel Sokol « UK Human Rights Blog


Description

W (by her litigation friend, B) v M (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam). Read judgment. In the first case of its kind, the Court of Protection ruled that withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from a person in a minimally conscious state was not, in the circumstances, in that person’s best interests. The Court also made general observations for future cases.

Preview

Tags

Users

  • @kclmel

Comments and Reviews