M. Cursi. La produzione scritta tecnica e scientifica nel Medioevo: libro e documento tra scuole e professioni. a cura di G. De Gregorio e M. Galante, Cisam, Spoleto, (2012)
M. Marulić, and B. Glavičić. Hrvatski latinisti, knj. 7 Academia Scientiarum et Artium Slavorum Meridionalium ; Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, Zagrabiae = Zagreb, (1974)
S. zu Berlin. (s. a.)M18494 Livius, Titus: Decades. Daran: Florus: Epitoma. Mit Beig. von Johannes Andreas (de Bossis), Bischof von Aleria. Venedig: Wendelin von Speyer, 1470. 2°.
L. Eustochius. Angelus and Jacobus Britannicus, Brescia, (1488)GW: 09482 Eustochius, Laurentius: Dialogus, qui inscribitur Studiosus etc. Brescia: Angelus und Jacobus Britannicus, nach 1.III.1488. 4°
28 Bl. ab⁸cd⁶. 39–40 Z. Typ. 3:77R.
Bl. 1 leer. Bl. 2a m. Sign. aii LAVRENTIVS EVSTOCHIVS MARCO SA-NVTO ET NICOLAO FOSCARO SALVTEM Oſtea mecū ſaepe: ac diu agitaui: … Endet Bl. 2b Z. 11 … Valete. Kal. Mar. Mcccclxxxviii. Z. 12 Laurentius Euſtochins Hieronymo Creſcētio. S. … Bl. 3a m. Sign. aiii Z. 20 LAVRENTII EVSTOCHII DIALOGOS QVI INSCRIBITVR STVDIOSVS INTERLOCVTORES FOENERATOR. STVDIOSVS MILES. FOENERATOR Vid mihi iis ambagibus: … Sign. b quo Arythmeticen: Geometriam: Musicen: & Aſtronomiam loca … Endet Bl. 27b Z. 18 Aſtra tenet: curaſque uirū hunc ludit inanes. F I N I S. Bl. 28 leer.
Inhalt: Bl. a2a: Widmungsbrief (Postea quam mecum saepe ac diu agitavi …). — a2b: Brief an Hieronymus Crescentius. — a3a: Dialogus (Quid mihi iis ambagibus …). — d1a: Briefe an Johannis Jacobus Michael (Non est quod nesciam …). — d1a: Briefe an Angelus Gabriel (Petisti a me rem …). — d2a: In funere Platinae elegia (Tene etiam sors …)..
A. Zaninović. Zbornik u proslavu petstogodišnjice rođenja Marka Marulića 1450-1950., page 301-310. Zagreb, Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, (1950)
N. Jovanović. Colloquia Maruliana XIII, page 67--88. Split, Književni krug Split, Marulianum, (2004)The Dialogus de Hercule a Christicolis superato is a twenty-page text written in about 1519, but not printed until June 13 1524, six months after the death of its author. This text is important for philological study of Marko Marulić, being the only one of his writings that we can read both in the autograph and in a contemporary printed edition. Moreover, this text very clearly --- both by its contents and by its physical appearance --- signalises its affiliation to Renaissance Humanism. The Dialogus provides points of reference for assessing how much can we trust the printed works of Marulić, and how does Maruić write when he intends to write as a Humanist..