part of a symposium on "Humanities Computing: formal methods, experimental practice" sponsored by King's College, London, May 13, 2000. By John Unsworth
All valid points, and I hope the fine folk at Google are paying attention to all the free R&D the library community is contributing to their cause. On the other hand, they're probably wishing they were a little less Beta and a bit more Alpha in terms of their content, interface and help files. I find it interesting that there's so much negative commentary, with an almost mean-spirited glee in the product's obvious short comings. It's not perfect, there are glaring shortcomings that will have to be fixed before it can compete with other, more polished, services. But, on the other hand, it is only Beta. The potential is enormous and I think we need to be realistic about what our patrons want to use. They want one search fits all with instant access to free full text. (...) But, we also need to recognize that it won't be librarians that will spell the success or failure of Google Scholar. It will be our patrons: faculty, staff, students and the general public.
<oXygen/> is a complete cross platform XML editor providing the tools for XML authoring, XML conversion, XML Schema, DTD, Relax NG and Schematron development, XPath, XSLT, XQuery debugging, SOAP and WSDL testing.
PhiloLogic™ is the primary full-text search, retrieval and
analysis tool developed by the ARTFL Project
and the Digital
Library Development Center (DLDC) at the University of Chicago. This is a
Free Software
implementation of PhiloLogic for large TEI-Lite document
collections.
K. Bobková-Valentová. XVIIIth International congress of the International association for Neo-Latin studies (IANLS): Half a Century of Neo-Latin Studies Leuven, 31 July – 5 August 2022. Abstracts, page 13. Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, (2022)
F. Zhao. Digital Humanities 2022 : Conference Abstracts : The University of Tokyo, Japan 25-29 July 2022, page 608-610. Tokyo, DH2022 Local Organizing Committee, (2022)