In this report, Professor Knaplund discusses the Montana Supreme Court case of Baxter v. State of Montana (2009 MT 449), which ruled on the issue of a doctor's liability in a physician aid in dying (PAD) situation. In this case, the plaintiff was suffering from mutual symptoms related to his terminal lymphocytic leukemia and the chemotheraphy treatments he was receiving for it. Along with several other named plaintiffs, including board-certified physicians and the group Compassion and Choice, Mr. Baxter sued to have the state's homicide statute declared to of the constitutional rights of those who are dying to seek a physician's aid in achieving death.
Whether the world will one day reach a consensus as to euthanasia and assisted suicide is anyone's guess. In the meantime, the legality of these procedures differs among jurisdictions, and as always some will be tempted to travel in search of that which they cannot get at home. But unlike other areas in which residents of one state or country can take advantage of another's liberality - laws on alcohol, marijuana, and gambling come to mind - the stakes and finality of end-of-life decisions make traveling to undergo life-ending procedures, or "death tourism," of unique concern to policymakers. The United States, save for Oregon and Washington (and maybe Montana), has for the time being decided against legalizing life-ending procedures. As such, state and federal governments would probably take issue with Americans traveling to get help dying. In this Article, I explore the phenomenon of death tourism and how our governments might attempt to prevent its exploitation by Americans.