Eine Zusammenstellung verschiedener Artikel, die sich kritisch mit Bibliometrie als Evaluationsinstrument auseinander setzen. Besonders interessant: Artikel von S. Hanard, der peer review und stat. Methoden miteinander vergleicht.
Citation analysis needs an in-depth transformation. Current systems have been long criticized due to shortcomings such as lack of coverage of publications and low accuracy of the citation data. Surprisingly, incomplete or incorrect data are used to make important decisions about researchers' careers. We argue that a new approach based on the collection of citation data at the time the papers are created can overcome current limitations, and we propose a new framework in which the research community is the owner of a Global Citation Registry characterized by high quality citation data handled automatically. We envision a registry that will be accessible by all the interested parties and will be the source from which the different impact models can be applied.
A survey cutting across all departments found at U.S. business schools was conducted to assess the readerships of 130 journals. The survey results can help researchers both in their understanding of the composition of potential readers at given journals and in the process of selecting journals for a desirable target audience. Survey respondents also reported the degree to which articles published in various journals have stimulated their thinking and in how far publications in particular journals are believed to help in increasing the researcher’s academic reputation.
Die gezeigten Posts sind eventuell nicht akkurat bei Änderungen, die vor Kurzem vorgenommen worden. Wollen Sie jedoch akkurate Posts mit eingeschränkten Sortierungsmöglichkeiten, folgen Sie dem folgenden Link.