%0 Journal Article %1 besterfieldsacre2014changing %A Besterfield-Sacre, Mary %A Cox, Monica F. %A Borrego, Maura %A Beddoes, Kacey %A Zhu, Jiabin %D 2014 %J Journal of Engineering Education %K Change EngineeringEducation NsfRED %N 2 %P 193--219 %R 10.1002/jee.20043 %T Changing Engineering Education: Views of U.S. Faculty, Chairs, and Deans %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jee.20043 %V 103 %X Background Many reports present a vision of what engineering education should look like, but few describe how this should happen. An American Society for Engineering Education initiative in 2006 attempted to bridge this gap by engaging faculty, chairs, and deans in discussion of change in engineering education; results were reported in a Phase I report (2009). In a second phase, survey data were integrated into a Phase II report (2012). Purpose This article uses the ASEE survey results to identify promising pathways for transforming engineering undergraduate education. Design/Method The survey asked faculty, chairs, and deans at engineering departments at 156 U.S. institutions to reflect on the recommendations of the Phase I report. Quantitative and qualitative responses were separately analyzed and then mixed by mapping findings to the Four Categories of Change Strategies model developed by Henderson et al. (2011), which frames the results and illustrates gaps and opportunities. Results Responses mapped to three of the four categories of the model that were most commonly used in other STEM education efforts: developing and disseminating new instructional approaches, supporting faculty members in their own scholarly teaching, and implementing policies that enable and reward teaching innovation. No responses mapped to developing a shared vision through activities such as strategic planning. Conclusions The greatest promise for transformative change in engineering education lies in developing a shared vision for educational innovation. The findings of this article provide a foundation for ongoing discussion and evaluating progress.

@article{besterfieldsacre2014changing, abstract = {Background Many reports present a vision of what engineering education should look like, but few describe how this should happen. An American Society for Engineering Education initiative in 2006 attempted to bridge this gap by engaging faculty, chairs, and deans in discussion of change in engineering education; results were reported in a Phase I report (2009). In a second phase, survey data were integrated into a Phase II report (2012). Purpose This article uses the ASEE survey results to identify promising pathways for transforming engineering undergraduate education. Design/Method The survey asked faculty, chairs, and deans at engineering departments at 156 U.S. institutions to reflect on the recommendations of the Phase I report. Quantitative and qualitative responses were separately analyzed and then mixed by mapping findings to the Four Categories of Change Strategies model developed by Henderson et al. (2011), which frames the results and illustrates gaps and opportunities. Results Responses mapped to three of the four categories of the model that were most commonly used in other STEM education efforts: developing and disseminating new instructional approaches, supporting faculty members in their own scholarly teaching, and implementing policies that enable and reward teaching innovation. No responses mapped to developing a shared vision through activities such as strategic planning. Conclusions The greatest promise for transformative change in engineering education lies in developing a shared vision for educational innovation. The findings of this article provide a foundation for ongoing discussion and evaluating progress. }, added-at = {2016-12-23T21:35:03.000+0100}, author = {Besterfield-Sacre, Mary and Cox, Monica F. and Borrego, Maura and Beddoes, Kacey and Zhu, Jiabin}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/28850fe231e5157c4b0fd00f4bb36843c/vngudivada}, doi = {10.1002/jee.20043}, interhash = {078a911d23c096c9f558696a9da73623}, intrahash = {8850fe231e5157c4b0fd00f4bb36843c}, issn = {2168-9830}, journal = {Journal of Engineering Education}, keywords = {Change EngineeringEducation NsfRED}, number = 2, pages = {193--219}, timestamp = {2019-03-25T17:10:56.000+0100}, title = {Changing Engineering Education: Views of U.S. Faculty, Chairs, and Deans}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jee.20043}, volume = 103, year = 2014 }